GHT-SELEX demonstrates unexpectedly high intrinsic sequence specificity and complex DNA binding of many human transcription factors
Arttu JolmaiD, Aldo Hernández-CorchadoiD, Ally W. H. YangiD, Ali FathiiD, Kaitlin U. LavertyiD, Alexander V. BrechaloviD, Rozita RazaviiD, Mihai AlbuiD, Hong ZhengiD, Philipp BücheriD, Bart DeplanckeiD, Oriol FornésiD, Jan GrauiD, Ivo GroßeiD, Fedor A. Kolpakov, Vsevolod J. MakeeviD, Marjan BarazandehiD, Zhenfeng DengiD, Chun HuiD, Samuel A. LambertiD, Zain M. Patel, Sara E. PouriD, Mikhail Salnikov, Isaac YellaniD, Georgy MeshcheryakoviD, , Timothy HughesiD
Abstract
Precise identification of transcription factor (TF) binding sites is a long standing challenge in human regulatory genomics: TF binding motifs are short and degenerate, while the genome is large. Motif scans, therefore, often produce excessive binding site predictions. By surveying 179 TFs across 25 families using >1,500 cyclic in vitro selection experiments with fragmented, naked, and unmodified genomic DNA - a method we term GHT-SELEX (Genomic HT-SELEX) - we find that many human TFs possess much higher sequence specificity than anticipated. Moreover, genomic binding regions from GHT-SELEX are often surprisingly similar to those obtained in vivo (i.e., ChIP-seq peaks). Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that high specificity can also be obtained from motif scans, but performance is highly dependent on the derivation and use of the motifs, including accounting for multiple local matches. We also observe alternative engagement of multiple DNA-binding domains within the same protein: long C2H2 zinc finger proteins often utilize modular DNA recognition, engaging different subsets of their DNA-binding domain (DBD) arrays to recognize multiple types of distinct target sites, frequently evolving via internal duplication and divergence of one or more DBDs. Thus, it is common for TFs to possess sufficient intrinsic specificity to delineate a large fraction of in vivo genomic targets, independently of other cellular factors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Codebook: sequence specificity and genomic binding of poorly-characterized human transcription factors
Arttu Jolma, Kaitlin U. Laverty, … Xiaoting Chen·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2024
- Beyond motif recognition: Specificity of human transcription factors in yeast
Joshua Bugis, Dan Reuben Zlotnik-Weinberg, … Naama Barkai·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2026
- Non-consensus flanking sequence of hundreds of base pairs around in vivo binding sites: statistical beacons for transcription factor scanning
Kateřina Faltejsková, Josef Šulc, Jiřı́ Vondrášek·bioRxiv·May 28, 2025
- Overlapping binding sites underlie TF genomic occupancy
Shubham Khetan, Martha L. Bulyk·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2024
- Systematic analysis of the genomic features involved in the binding preferences of transcription factors
R. Romero, Christophe Menichelli, … Laurent Bréhélin·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2022
- Co-SELECT reveals sequence non-specific contribution of DNA shape to transcription factor binding in vitro
Soumitra Pal, Jan Hoinka, Teresa M. Przytycka·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2019