HPV16 and HPV18 type-specific APOBEC3 and integration profiles in different diagnostic categories of cervical samples
Sonja Lagström, Alexander Hesselberg LøvestadiD, Sinan U. UmuiD, Ole Herman AmburiD, Mari NygårdiD, Trine B. RoungeiD, Irene Kraus ChristianseniD
Abstract
Human papillomavirus 16 and 18 are the most predominant types in cervical cancer. Only a small fraction of HPV infections progress to cancer, indicating that genomic factors, such as minor nucleotide variation caused by APOBEC3 and chromosomal integration, contribute to the carcinogenesis. We analysed minor nucleotide variants (MNVs) and integration in HPV16 and HPV18 positive cervical samples with different morphology. Samples were sequenced using an HPV whole genome sequencing protocol TaME-seq. A total of 80 HPV16 and 51 HPV18 positive cervical cell samples passed the sequencing depth criteria of 300x reads, showing the following distribution: non-progressive disease (HPV16 n=21, HPV18 n=12); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 (HPV16 n=27, HPV18 n=9); CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (HPV16 n=27, HPV18 n=30); cervical cancer (HPV16 n=5). Similar rates of MNVs in HPV16 and HPV18 samples were observed for most viral genes but for HPV16, the non-coding region (NCR) showed a trend towards increasing variation with increasing lesion severity. APOBEC3 signatures were observed in HPV16 lesions, while similar mutation patterns were not detected for HPV18. The proportion of samples with integration was 13% for HPV16 and 59% for HPV18 positive samples, with a noticeable portion located within or close to cancer-related genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Human papillomavirus type 16 sub-lineages and integration in cancer
R. Jackson, A. Ortigas-Vasquez, I. Zehbe·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2020
- Human papillomavirus 16 positive cervical cancer in Guatemala: The D2 and D3 sublineages differ in integration rate and age of diagnosis
H. Lou, J. F. Boland, … M. Dean·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2020
- Genomic structures and regulation patterns at HPV integration sites in cervical cancer
Vanessa Porter, Michelle Ng, … Marco A. Marra·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- Three-dimensional interactions between integrated HPV genomes and cellular chromatin dysregulate host gene expression in early cervical carcinogenesis
I. J. Groves, E. L. Drane, … N. Coleman·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2021
- Genetic characteristics of human papillomavirus type 16, 18, 52 and 58 in southern China
Yuee Zu, Zhihua Ou, … Junhua Li·GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2021
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of HPV Integration Architectures Drive Oncogenic Features of Oropharyngeal Cancer
Wenjin Gu, Apurva Dhanesh Bhangale, … John Chad Brenner·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2026