Sign in
Cancer BiologybioRxiv

Human papillomavirus 16 positive cervical cancer in Guatemala: The D2 and D3 sublineages differ in integration rate and age of diagnosis

H. Lou, J. F. Boland, E. Torres-Gonzalez, A. Albanez, W. Zhou, M. Steinberg, L. Diaw, J. Mitchell, D. Roberson, M. Cullen, L. Garland, S. Bass, R. Burk, M. Yeager, N. Wentzensen, M. Schiffman, E. Alvirez, E. Gharzouzi, L. Mirabello, M. Dean

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 displays substantial sequence variation; four HPV16 lineages (A, B, C, D) have been described, as well as multiple sub-lineages. To identify molecular events associated with HPV16 carcinogenesis we evaluated viral variation, the integration of HPV16, and somatic mutation in 96 cervical cancer samples from Guatemala. A total of 64% (60/94) of the samples had integrated HPV16 sequences, and integration was associated with an earlier age of diagnosis (P=0.0007) and pre-menopausal disease. HPV16 integration sites were broadly distributed in the genome but in one tumor, HPV16 integrated into the promoter of the interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) gene, which plays an important role in the regulation of the interferon response to viral infection. The HPV16 D2 and D3 sub-lineages were found in 23% and 30% of the tumors, respectively and were significantly associated with adenocarcinoma. D2-positive tumors had a higher rate of integration (P=0.011), earlier age of diagnosis (P=0.012), and a lower rate of somatic mutation (P=0.03). Whereas D3-positive tumors are less likely to integrate, have later age-of-diagnosis, and a higher rate of somatic mutation. In conclusion, Guatemalan cervical tumors have a high frequency of the very high-risk HPV16 D2 and D3 sub-lineages and cervical cancer patients with these variants of HPV16 differ in histology, age of- diagnosis, integration, and somatic mutation frequency. In summary, related lineages of HPV16 have different features of oncogenicity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.