Genome-wide repressive capacity of promoter DNA methylation is revealed through epigenomic manipulation
Abstract
The scientific community is increasingly embracing open science. This growing commitment to open science should be applauded and encouraged, especially when it occurs voluntarily and prior to peer review. Thanks to other researchers dedication to open science, we have had the privilege of conducting a reanalysis of a landmark experiment published as a preprint with data made available in a public repository. The study in question found that promoter DNA methylation is frequently insufficient to induce transcriptional repression, which appears to contradict a large body of observational studies showing a strong association between DNA methylation and gene expression. This study was the first to evaluate whether forcibly methylating thousands of DNA promoter regions is sufficient to suppress gene expression. The authors data analysis did not find a strong relationship between promoter methylation and transcriptional repression. However, their analyses did not make full use of statistical inference and applied a normalization technique that removes global differences that are representative of the actual biological system. Here we reanalyze the data with an approach that includes statistical inference of differentially methylated regions, as well as a normalization technique that accounts for global expression differences. We find that forced DNA methylation of thousands of promoters overwhelmingly represses gene expression. In addition, we show that complementary epigenetic marks of active transcription are reduced as a result of DNA methylation. Finally, by studying whether these associations are sensitive to the CG density of promoters, we find no substantial differences in the association between promoters with and without a CG island. The code needed to reproduce are analysis is included in the public GitHub repository github.com/kdkorthauer/repressivecapacity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Frequent lack of repressive capacity of promoter DNA methylation identified through genome-wide epigenomic manipulation
Ethan Ford, Matthew Grimmer, … Ryan Lister·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2017
- Cellular heterogeneity-adjusted clonal methylation (CHALM) provides better prediction of gene expression
Jianfeng Xu, Jiejun Shi, … Wei Li·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2020
- Tuning methylation-dependent silencing dynamics by synthetic modulation of CpG density
Yitong Ma, Mark W. Budde, … Michael B. Elowitz·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2023
- Characteristics of DNA methylation and gene expression in regulatory features on the Infinium 450k Beadchip
David Martino, Richard Saffery·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2015
- Systematic identification of regions where DNA methylation is correlated with transcription refines regulatory logic in normal and tumour tissues
Richard Heery, Martin H. Schaefer·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2025
- Genome-wide identification of genes regulating DNA methylation using genetic anchors for causal inference
Paul J. Hop, René Luijk, … M. Arfan Ikram·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2020