A systematic review of professional society-backed biology education DEI research: The groups, research methods, and levels of analyses comprising the field
Candice IdlebirdiD, Rebecca A. Campbell-MontalvoiD, Gary S. McDowelliD, Emily BlosseriD, Richard D. HarveyiD, Yiwen ZhaiD, Jana MarcetteiD
Abstract
This integrative literature review analyzes the corpus of biology education research published in the main biology education journals of major professional societies. The goal of this analysis is to determine which approaches (including groups of focus, research methods, and settings/perspectives) from social science fields (i.e., psychology, sociology, and anthropology) are utilized in published peer-reviewed biology education research relating to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Scoping how social science approaches are used in this area is important to understanding whether biology education research could benefit from complementary approaches that might advance praxis. This analysis found that research informing the biology education community draws heavily from psychological perspectives that are overwhelmingly not disaggregated (78% of articles identifying a group used a lumped together one), are by far more quantitative (58% used survey, 26% grades, 20% school data) than qualitative (17% used interview, 10% observation), and did not (72%) adopt structural approaches. The addition of missing contributions from social science is critical to advancing interventions to broaden STEM participation given that merging paradigms can offer more robust, multi-level explanations for observed phenomena. This has important implications for education, biology education, biology education research, social science, and research in related STEM fields.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 20th percentile
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inclusive Biology Curriculum Interventions Can Reduce High School Students' Bioessentialist Beliefs
Charlie K. Blake, Onyebuchi Stephanie Ewa, Emily B. Eckles·CBE—Life Sciences EducationPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2026
- A QuantCrit investigation of society's educational debts due to racism, sexism, and classism in biology student learning
J. Nissen, B. Van Dusen, S. Kukday·bioRxiv·May 5, 2022
- A framework for decolonising and diversifying biomedical sciences curricula: rediscovery, representation and readiness
T. Lu, Z. I. Bashir, … A. Robson·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2023
- Building Inclusive Leadership: A Biosciences Approach
Emily May Armstrong, Lydia Bach, … Matt Jones·The BiochemistPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- LGBTQ+ realities in the biological sciences
Katelyn M. Cooper, Carly A. Busch, … Rebecca S. Alvania·CBE—Life Sciences EducationPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2026
- Trends in scientific research on Environmental Education: A scientometric review
L. F. Gomes, H. R. Pereira·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2020