Image-based metric of invasiveness predicts response to adjuvant temozolomide for primary glioblastoma
S. C. Massey, H. White, P. Whitmire, T. Doyle, S. K. Johnston, K. W. Singleton, P. R. Jackson, A. Hawkins-Daarud, B. R. Bendok, A. B. Porter, S. Vora, J. N. Sarkaria, M. M. Mrugala, K. R. Swanson
Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ) has been the standard-of-care chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) patients for more than a decade. Despite this long time in use, significant questions remain regarding how best to optimize TMZ therapy for individual patients. Understanding the relationship between TMZ response and factors such as number of adjuvant TMZ cycles, patient age, patient sex, and image-based tumor features, might help predict which GBM patients would benefit most from TMZ, particularly for those whose tumors are not MGMT methylated. Using a cohort of 90 newly-diagnosed GBM patients treated according to the Stupp protocol, we examined the relationships between several patient and tumor characteristics and volumetric and survival outcomes during adjuvant chemotherapy. Volumetric changes in MR imaging abnormalities during adjuvant therapy were used to assess TMZ response. T1Gd volumetric response is associated with younger patient age, increased number of TMZ cycles, longer time to nadir volume, and decreased tumor invasiveness. Moreover, increased adjuvant TMZ cycles corresponded with improved volumetric response only among more nodular tumors, and this volumetric response was associated with improved survival outcomes. Finally, in a subcohort of patients with known MGMT methylation status, MGMT methylated tumors were more diffusely invasive than unmethylated tumors, suggesting that the improved response in nodular tumors is not driven by a preponderance of MGMT methylated tumors. Our finding that less diffusely invasive tumors are associated with greater volumetric response to TMZ suggests that patients with these tumors may benefit from additional cycles of adjuvant TMZ, even for those without MGMT methylation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantitation of brain tumour microstructure response to Temozolomide therapy using non-invasive VERDICT MRI
Tom A. Roberts, Harpreet Hyare, … Simon Walker-Samuel·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2017
- Glioblastoma recurrence and the role of MGMT promoter methylation
Katie Storey, Kevin Leder, … Jasmine Foo·bioRxiv·May 9, 2018
- Size-dependent invasion and therapeutic phenotype of 42MGBA glioblastoma spheroids
Sheridan Ke-Wing Fok, Anagha Shreesha, … Brendan A.C. Harley·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025
- Metabolic-imaging of human glioblastoma explants: a new precision-medicine model to predict tumor treatment response early
Mariangela Morelli, Francesca Lessi, … Chiara Maria Mazzanti·Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2022
- Temozolomide-associated inflammatory-repair remodeling in recurrent glioblastoma exposes a ROCK-linked therapeutic vulnerability
Rafał Chojak, Umme Habiba Faisal, … Atique U. Ahmed·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Multicellular model of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma reveals phenotypic shifts in drug response and migratory potential
Victoria A. Kriuchkovskaia, Ela K. Eames, … Brendan A.C. Harley·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2025