henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

NanoSplicer: Accurate identification of splice junctions using Oxford Nanopore sequencing

Yupei YouiD, Michael B. ClarkiD, Heejung ShimiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

MotivationLong read sequencing methods have considerable advantages for characterising RNA isoforms. Oxford nanopore sequencing records changes in electrical current when nucleic acid traverses through a pore. However, basecalling of this raw signal (known as a squiggle) is error prone, making it challenging to accurately identify splice junctions. Existing strategies include utilising matched short-read data and/or annotated splice junctions to correct nanopore reads but add expense or limit junctions to known (incomplete) annotations. Therefore, a method that could accurately identify splice junctions solely from nanopore data would have numerous advantages. ResultsWe developed "NanoSplicer" to identify splice junctions using raw nanopore signal (squiggles). For each splice junction the observed squiggle is compared to candidate squiggles representing potential junctions to identify the correct candidate. Measuring squiggle similarity enables us to compute the probability of each candidate junction and find the most likely one. We tested our method using 1. synthetic mRNAs with known splice junctions 2. biological mRNAs from a lung-cancer cell-line. The results from both datasets demonstrate NanoSplicer improves splice junction identification, especially when the basecalling error rate near the splice junction is elevated. Our method is implemented in the software package NanoSplicer, available at https://github.com/shimlab/NanoSplicer.

Citations
19
FWCI
1.06
Field percentile
top 26%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMapleson '18White '22Faucon '17Mulroney '21Zhu '25Dong '21
69% semantic matchBioinformatics
Daniel Mapleson, Luca Venturini, Gemy Kaithakottil+1 more·GigaScience·Nov 12, 2018· 147 citations