Deep Learning-Based Point-Scanning Super-Resolution Imaging
Linjing FangiD, Fred MonroeiD, Sammy Weiser NovakiD, Lyndsey M. KirkiD, Cara R. SchiavoniD, Seungyoon B. YuiD, Tong ZhangiD, Melissa WuiD, Kyle Kastner, Alaa Abdel LatifiD, Zijun LiniD, Andrew Shaw, Yoshiyuki KubotaiD, John M. Mendenhall, Zhao ZhangiD, Gülçin PekkurnaziD, Kristen M. HarrisiD, Jeremy HowardiD, Uri ManoriD
Abstract
Point scanning imaging systems (e.g. scanning electron or laser scanning confocal microscopes) are perhaps the most widely used tools for high resolution cellular and tissue imaging. Like all other imaging modalities, the resolution, speed, sample preservation, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of point scanning systems are difficult to optimize simultaneously. In particular, point scanning systems are uniquely constrained by an inverse relationship between imaging speed and pixel resolution. Here we show these limitations can be mitigated via the use of deep learning-based super-sampling of undersampled images acquired on a point-scanning system, which we termed point-scanning super-resolution (PSSR) imaging. Oversampled, high SNR ground truth images acquired on scanning electron or Airyscan laser scanning confocal microscopes were crappified to generate semi-synthetic training data for PSSR models that were then used to restore real-world undersampled images. Remarkably, our EM PSSR model could restore undersampled images acquired with different optics, detectors, samples, or sample preparation methods in other labs. PSSR enabled previously unattainable 2 nm resolution images with our serial block face scanning electron microscope system. For fluorescence, we show that undersampled confocal images combined with a multiframe PSSR model trained on Airyscan timelapses facilitates Airyscan-equivalent spatial resolution and SNR with [~]100x lower laser dose and 16x higher frame rates than corresponding high-resolution acquisitions. In conclusion, PSSR facilitates point-scanning image acquisition with otherwise unattainable resolution, speed, and sensitivity.\n\n\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=116 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/740548v8_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (90K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fbf19aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b2cc88org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@921e1corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f6c5af_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 203
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- PSSR2: a user-friendly Python package for democratizing deep learning-based point-scanning super-resolution microscopy
Hayden Stites, Uri Manor·BMC MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Deep learning achieves super-resolution in fluorescence microscopy
H. Wang, Y. Rivenson, … A. Ozcan·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2018
- Learned SPARCOM: Unfolded Deep Super-Resolution Microscopy
G. Dardikman-Yoffe, Y. C. Eldar·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2020
- Multiview super-resolution microscopy
- Content-Aware Image Restoration: Pushing the Limits of Fluorescence Microscopy
MARTIN G. WEIGERT, Uwe Schmidt, … Eugene Wimberly Myers·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2018
- Calibration-free single-frame super-resolution fluorescence microscopy
Anežka Dostálová, Dominik Vašinka, … Miroslav Ježek·Laser & Photonics ReviewPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2026