Comparison of sequence- and structure-based antibody clustering approaches on simulated repertoire sequencing data
Katharina WauryiD, Stefan H. LelieveldiD, Sanne AbelniD, Henk‐Jan van den HamiD
Abstract
Repertoire sequencing allows us to investigate the antibody-mediated immune response. The clustering of sequences is a crucial step in the data analysis pipeline, aiding in the identification of functionally related antibodies. The conventional clustering approach of clonotyping relies on sequence information, particularly CDRH3 sequence identity and V/J gene usage, to group sequences into clonotypes. It has been suggested that the limitations of sequence-based approaches to identify sequence-dissimilar but functionally converged antibodies can be overcome by using structure information to group antibodies. Recent advances have made structure-based methods feasible on a repertoire level. However, so far, their performance has only been evaluated on single-antigen sets of antibodies. A comprehensive comparison of the benefits and limitations of structure-based tools on realistic and diverse repertoire data is missing. Here, we aim to explore the promise of structure-based clustering algorithms to replace or augment the standard sequence-based approach, specifically by identifying low-sequence identity groups. Two methods, SAAB+ and SPACE2, are evaluated against clonotyping. We curated a dataset of well-annotated pairs of antibodies that show high overlap in epitope residues and thus bind the same region within their respective antigen. This set of antibodies was introduced into a simulated repertoire to compare the performance of clustering approaches on a diverse antibody set. Our analysis reveals that structure-based methods do produce more multiple-occupancy clusters compared to clonotyping. However, it also highlights the limitations associated with the need for same-length CDR regions by SPACE2. This work thoroughly compares the utility of different clustering methods and provides insights into what further steps are required to effectively use antibody structural information to group immune repertoire data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Field percentile
- 46th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improved computational epitope profiling using structural models identifies a broader diversity of antibodies that bind the same epitope
Fabian C. Spoendlin, Brennan Abanades, … Charlotte Mary Deane·Frontiers in Molecular BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2023
- IgEvolution: clonal analysis of antibody repertoires
Y. Safonova, P. A. Pevzner·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2019
- Evidence of Antibody Repertoire Functional Convergence through Public Baseline and Shared Response Structures
M. I. J. Raybould, C. Marks, … C. Deane·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2020
- Epitope profiling of coronavirus-binding antibodies using computational structural modelling
S. A. Robinson, M. I. J. Raybould, … C. M. Deane·PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Ab-Ligity: Identifying sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind to the same epitope
Wing Ki Wong, Sarah A. Robinson, … Charlotte Mary Deane·mAbsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- A multi-objective based clustering for identifying clonally-related sequences from high-throughput B cell repertoire data
Nika Abdollahi, Anne Langlois de Septenville, … Juliana Bernardes·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2021