Sign in
ImmunologybioRxiv

Evidence of Antibody Repertoire Functional Convergence through Public Baseline and Shared Response Structures

M. I. J. Raybould, C. Marks, A. Kovaltsuk, A. P. Lewis, J. Shi, C. Deane

Abstract

The antibody repertoires of different individuals ought to exhibit significant functional commonality, given that most pathogens trigger a successful immune response in most people. Sequence-based approaches have so far offered little evidence for this phenomenon. For example, a recent study estimated the number of shared ( public) antibody clonotypes in circulating baseline repertoires to be around 0.02% across ten unrelated individuals. However, to engage the same epitope, antibodies only require a similar binding site structure and the presence of key paratope interactions, which can occur even when their sequences are dissimilar. Here, we investigate functional convergence in human antibody repertoires by comparing the anti-body structures they contain. We first structurally profile base-line antibody diversity (using snapshots from 41 unrelated individuals), predicting all modellable distinct structures within each repertoire. This analysis uncovers a high (much greater than random) degree of structural commonality. For instance, around 3% of distinct structures are common to the ten most diverse individual samples ( Public Baseline structures). Our approach is the first computational method to provide support for the long-assumed levels of baseline repertoire functional commonality. We then apply the same structural profiling approach to repertoire snapshots from three individuals before and after flu vaccination, detecting a convergent structural drift indicative of recognising similar epitopes ( Public Response structures). Antibody Model Libraries derived from Public Baseline and Public Response structures represent a powerful geometric basis set of low-immunogenicity candidates exploitable for general or target-focused therapeutic antibody screening.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.