Stem CellsDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
The miR-290 and miR-302 clusters are essential for reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells
Julia YeiD, Ryan M. BoileauiD, Ronald J. ParchemiD, Robert L. Judson‐TorresiD, Robert H. BlellochiD
Abstract
The miR-290 and miR-302 clusters of microRNAs are highly expressed in naive and primed pluripotent stem cells, respectively. Ectopic expression of the embryonic stem cell-specific cell cycle regulating (ESCC) family of microRNAs arising from these two clusters dramatically enhances the reprogramming of both mouse and human somatic cells to induced pluripotency. Here, we used genetic knockouts to dissect the requirement for the miR-290 and miR-302 clusters during the reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with retrovirally introduced Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4. Knockout of either cluster alone did not negatively impact the efficiency of reprogramming. Resulting cells appeared identical to their embryonic stem cell microRNA cluster knockout counterparts. In contrast, the combined loss of both clusters blocked the formation of iPSCs. While rare double knockout clones could be isolated, they showed a dramatically reduced proliferation rate, a persistent inability to fully silence the exogenously introduced pluripotency factors, and a transcriptome distinct from individual miR-290 or miR-302 mutant ESC and iPSCs. Taken together, our data show that miR-290 and miR-302 are essential yet interchangeable in reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Impact StatementThe process by which somatic cell reprogramming yields induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is incompletely understood. MicroRNAs from the miR-290 and miR-302 clusters have been shown to greatly increase reprogramming efficiency, but their requirement in the process has not been studied. Here, we examine this requirement by genetically removing the miRNA clusters in somatic cells. We discover that somatic cells lacking either, but not both, of these miRNA clusters can form iPSC cells. This work thus provides new important insight into mechanisms underlying reprogramming to pluripotency.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Field percentile
- top 26%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- miR-203 imposes an intrinsic barrier during cellular reprogramming by targeting NFATC2
M. Salazar-Roa, S. Martinez-Martinez, … M. Malumbres·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2020
- NCOR1 AND OCT4 FACILITATE EARLY REPROGRAMMING BY CO-SUPPRESSING FIBROBLAST GENE EXPRESSION
Georgina Peñalosa-Ruiz, Klaas W. Mulder, Gert Jan C. Veenstra·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2020
- Efficient and Rapid generation of neural stem cells by direct conversion Fibroblasts with A Single microRNA
Yuanyuan Li, Jing Sun, … Yuesi Wang·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2021
- Expression of the miR-302/367 microRNA cluster is regulated by a conserved long non-coding host gene
Karim Rahimi, Annette Christine Füchtbauer, … Ernst‐Martin Füchtbauer·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2021
- Transgenic Mice and Pluripotent Stem Cells Express EGFP under the Control of miR-302 Promoter
Karim Rahimi, Sara Parsa, … Fardin Fathi·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2018
- Transient let-7/miR-98 reprograms primed pluripotency to induce naivehuman PSCs
Yoshihiko Fujita, Moe Hirosawa, … Hirohide Saito·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2025