NCOR1 AND OCT4 FACILITATE EARLY REPROGRAMMING BY CO-SUPPRESSING FIBROBLAST GENE EXPRESSION
Georgina Peñalosa-RuiziD, Klaas W. MulderiD, Gert Jan C. VeenstraiD
Abstract
Reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) succeeds only in a small fraction of cells within the population. Reprogramming occurs in distinctive stages, each facing its own bottlenecks. It initiates with overexpression of transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC (OSKM) in somatic cells such as mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). OSKM bind chromatin, silencing the somatic identity and starting the stepwise reactivation of the pluripotency program. However, inefficient suppression of the somatic lineage leads to unwanted epigenetic memory from the tissue of origin, even in successfully generated iPSCs. Thus, it is essential to shed more light on chromatin regulators and processes involved in dissolving the somatic identity. Recent work characterized the role of transcriptional co-repressors NCOR1 and NCOR2 (also known as NCoR and SMRT), showing that they cooperate with c-MYC to silence pluripotency genes during late reprogramming stages. NCOR1/NCOR2 were also proposed to be involved in silencing fibroblast identity, however it is unclear how this happens. Here, we shed light on the role of NCOR1 in early reprogramming. We show that siRNA-mediated ablation of NCOR1 and OCT4 results in very similar phenotypes, including transcriptomic changes and highly correlated high content colony phenotypes.. Both NCOR1 and OCT4 bind to promoters co-occupied by c-MYC in MEFs. During early reprogramming, downregulation of one group of somatic MEF-expressed genes requires both NCOR1 and OCT4, whereas another group of MEF-expressed genes is downregulated by NCOR1 but not OCT4. Our data suggest that NCOR1, assisted by OCT4 and c-MYC, facilitates transcriptional inactivation of genes with high expression in MEFs, which need to be suppressed to bypass an early reprogramming block. This way, NCOR1 facilitates early reprogramming progression.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 45%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- p16High senescence restricts totipotent potential during somatic cell reprogramming
B. B. Grigorash, D. van Essen, … D. Bulavin·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2022
- The miR-290 and miR-302 clusters are essential for reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells
Julia Ye, Ryan M. Boileau, … Robert H. Blelloch·Stem CellsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2025
- Defining reprogramming checkpoints from single-cell analysis of induced pluripotency
Khoa A. Tran, Stefan Pietrzak, … Rupa Sridharan·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- ALKBH5 regulates somatic cell reprogramming in a phase specific manner
S. M. Khodeer, A. Klungland, J. A. Dahl·bioRxiv·May 10, 2021
- OCT4 is expressed in extraembryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cell progenitors during somatic cell reprogramming
Alexandra Moauro, Stephanie L. Hickey, … Amy Ralston·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2024
- High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency
Asaf Zviran, Nofar Mor, … Jacob H. Hanna·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2017