microLifeBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Comprehensive Analysis of CRISPR Array Repeat Mutations Reveals Subtype-Specific Patterns and Links to Spacer Dynamics
Alexander MitrofanoviD, Chase L. BeiseliD, Franz BaumdickeriD, Omer S. AlkhnbashiiD, Rolf BackofeniD
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas systems are adaptive immune mechanisms in bacteria and archaea that protect against invading genetic elements by integrating short fragments of foreign DNA into CRISPR arrays. These arrays consist of repetitive sequences interspersed with unique spacers, guiding Cas proteins to recognize and degrade matching nucleic acids. The integrity of these repeat sequences is crucial for the proper function of CRISPR-Cas systems, yet their mutational dynamics remain poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed 56,343 CRISPR arrays across 25,628 diverse prokaryotic genomes to assess the mutation patterns in CRISPR array repeat sequences within and across different CRISPR subtypes. Our findings reveal, as expected to some extent, that mutation frequency is substantially higher in terminal repeat sequences compared to internal repeats consistently across system types. However, the mutation patterns exhibit an unexpected amount of variation among different CRISPR subtypes, suggesting that selective pressures and functional constraints shape repeat sequence evolution in distinct ways. Understanding these mutation dynamics provides insights into the stability and adaptability of CRISPR arrays across diverse bacterial and archaeal lineages. Additionally, we elucidate a novel relationship between repeat mutations and spacer dynamics, demonstrating that hotspots for terminal repeat mutations coincide with regions exhibiting spacer conservation. This observation corroborates recent findings by Fehrenbach et al. (2024) indicating that spacer deletions occur at a frequency 374 times greater than that of mutations and are significantly influenced by repeat misalignment. Our findings suggest that repeat mutations play a pivotal role in spacer retention or loss, or vice versa, thereby highlighting an evolutionary trade-off between the stability and adaptability of CRISPR arrays.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Unveiling the Evolution of CRISPR Spacer Number: A Phylogenetic Analysis of its Correlation with Repeat Characteristics
Jia Liu, Rui Huang, Deng‐Ke Niu·bioRxiv·May 23, 2024
- High Frequency of Dynamic Rearrangements in CRISPR Loci
Y. Ou, J. O. McInerney·bioRxiv·May 19, 2022
- The complexity of multiple CRISPR arrays in strains with (co-occurring) CRISPR systems
Axel Fehrenbach, Alexander Mitrofanov, … Franz Baumdicker·microLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- SpacerPlacer: Ancestral reconstruction of CRISPR arrays reveals the evolutionary dynamics of spacer deletions
Axel Fehrenbach, Alexander Mitrofanov, … Franz Baumdicker·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2024
- Directional purine pyrimidine asymmetry in CRISPR repeats facilitates spacer acquisition
S Barik, Parthasarathi Sahu, … Hemachander Subramanian·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2026
- Comprehensive PAM prediction for CRISPR-Cas systems reveals evidence for spacer sharing, preferred strand targeting and conserved links with CRISPR repeats
Jochem N. A. Vink, Jan H. L. Baijens, Stan J. J. Brouns·bioRxiv·May 4, 2021