eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Sibling chimerism among microglia in marmosets
Ricardo C.H. del RosarioiD, Fenna M. KrieneniD, Qiangge ZhangiD, Melissa GoldmaniD, Curtis J. MelloiD, Alyssa Lutservitz, Kiku IchiharaiD, Alec Wysoker, James C. Nemesh, Guoping FengiD, Steven A. McCarrolliD
Abstract
Chimerism happens rarely among most mammals but is common in marmosets and tamarins, a result of fraternal twin or triplet birth patterns in which in utero connected circulatory systems (through which stem cells transit) lead to persistent blood chimerism (12-80%) throughout life. The presence of Y-chromosome DNA sequences in organs of female marmosets has long suggested that chimerism might also affect these organs. However, a longstanding question is whether this chimerism is driven by blood-derived cells or involves contributions from other cell types. To address this question, we analyzed single-cell RNA-seq data from blood, liver, kidney and many brain regions across a number of marmosets, using transcribed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify cells with the siblings genome in various cell types within these tissues. Sibling-derived chimerism in all tissues arose entirely from cells of hematopoietic origin (i.e., myeloid and lymphoid lineages). In brain tissue this was reflected as sibling-derived chimerism among microglia (20-52%) and macrophages (18-64%) but not among other resident cell types (neurons, glia or ependymal cells). The percentage of microglia that were sibling-derived showed significant variation across brain regions, even within individual animals, likely reflecting distinct responses by genetic-sibling microglia to local recruitment or proliferation cues or, potentially, distinct clonal expansion histories in different brain areas. In the animals and tissues we analyzed, microglial gene expression profiles bore a much stronger relationship to local/host context than to sibling genetic differences. Naturally occurring marmoset chimerism will provide new ways to recognize the effects of genes, mutations and brain contexts on microglial biology and to distinguish between effects of microglia and other cell types on brain phenotypes.
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Microenvironment Impacts the Molecular Architecture and Interactivity of Resident Cells in Marmoset Brain
Jing‐Ping Lin, Hannah M. Kelly, … Daniel S. Reich·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2022
- Microchimerism in the human brain, quantitative assessment and single nuclei profiling establish cell types and diversity
Sami B. Kanaan, Ashley McDonough, … J. Lee Nelson·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- A marmoset brain cell census reveals influence of developmental origin and functional class on neuronal identity
Fenna M. Krienen, Kirsten M. Levandowski, … Guoping Feng·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2023
- Characterization of the intraspecies chimeric mouse brain at embryonic day 12.5
Phoebe Strell, Madison A. Waldron, … Walter C. Low·Cell TransplantationPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Inferring the landscapes of mutation and recombination in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in the presence of twinning and hematopoietic chimerism
Vivak Soni, Cyril J. Versoza, … Susanne P. Pfeifer·American Journal of PrimatologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2026
- Monocyte-derived microglia with Dnmt3a mutation cause motor pathology in aging mice
J.-S. Kim, S. Trzebanski, … S. Jung·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2023