bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Understanding boundary effects and confocal optics enables quantitative FRAP analysis in the confined geometries of animal, plant, and fungal cells
James L. Kingsley, Jeffrey P. Bibeau, S. Iman Mousavi, Cem Unsal, Zhilu Chen, Xinming Huang, Luis Vidali, Erkan TüzeliD
Abstract
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) is an important tool used by cell biologists to study the diffusion and binding kinetics of vesicles, proteins, and other molecules in the cytoplasm, nucleus or cell membrane. While many FRAP models have been developed over the past decades, the influence of the complex boundaries of three-dimensional cellular geometries on the recovery curves, in conjunction with ROI and optical effects (imaging, photobleaching, photoswitching, and scanning), has not been well studied. Here, we developed a three-dimensional computational model of the FRAP process that incorporates particle diffusion, cell boundary effects, and the optical properties of the scanning confocal microscope, and validated this model using the tip-growing cells of Physcomitrella patens. We then show how these cell boundary and optical effects confound the interpretation of FRAP recovery curves, including the number of dynamic states of a given fluorescent protein, in a wide range of cellular geometries-both in two and three dimensions-namely nuclei, filopodia, and lamellipodia of mammalian cells, and in cell types such as the budding yeast, S. pombe, and tip-growing plant cells. We explored the performance of existing analytical and algorithmic FRAP models in these various cellular geometries, and determined that the VCell VirtualFRAP tool provides the best accuracy to measure diffusion coefficients. Our computational model is not limited only to these cells types, but can easily be extended to other cellular geometries via the graphical Java-based application we also provide. This particle-based simulation-called the Digital Confocal Microscopy Suite, DCMS-can also perform fluorescence dynamics assays, such as Number and Brightness (N&B), Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), Raster Image Correlation Spectroscopy (RICS), and could help shape the way these techniques are interpreted.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: fluorescence / live-cell microscopy
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond analytic solution: analysis of FRAP experiments by spatial simulation of the forward problem
A. E. Cowan, L. M. Loew·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2023
- Experimental and simulated FRAP for the quantitative determination of protein diffusion in helical cells
Shariful Sakib, Cécile Fradin·Methods and Applications in FluorescencePeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2026
- Inferring diffusion, reaction, and exchange parameters from imperfect FRAP
Enrico Lorenzetti, Celia Municio-Diaz, … Antoine Fruleux·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2025
- Combined Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy and FRAP maps intranuclear diffusion of NLS-GFP
C. M. Hobson, E. T. O'Brien, … R. Superfine·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Analysis of chemical and mechanical behaviors in living cells by continuum mechanics-based FRAP
T. Saito, D. Matsunaga, S. Deguchi·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2022
- FRAP-in-SR: Fluorescence recovery in the Super-Resolution regime reveals subcompartments of 53BP1 foci
Chengchen Wu, Janeth Catalina Manjarrez-González, … Viji M. Draviam·bioRxiv·May 7, 2025