PLoS ONEGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
DNA isolation protocol effects on nuclear DNA analysis by microarrays, droplet digital PCR, and whole genome sequencing, and on mitochondrial DNA copy number estimation
Elizabeth P. Nacheva, Katya Mokretar, Aynur Soenmez, Alan Michael PittmaniD, Colin D. Grace, Roberto ValliiD, Ayesha EjaziD, Selina VattathiliD, Emanuela MaseratiiD, Henry HouldeniD, Jan‐Willem TaanmaniD, Anthony H.V. SchapiraiD, Christos ProukakisiD
Abstract
Potential bias introduced during DNA isolation is inadequately explored, although it could have significant impact on downstream analysis. To investigate this in human brain, we isolated DNA from cerebellum and frontal cortex using spin columns under different conditions, and salting-out. We first analysed DNA using array CGH, which revealed a striking wave pattern suggesting primarily GC-rich cerebellar losses, even against matched frontal cortex DNA, with a similar pattern on a SNP array. The aCGH changes varied with the isolation protocol. Droplet digital PCR of two genes also showed protocol-dependent losses. Whole genome sequencing showed GC-dependent variation in coverage with spin column isolation from cerebellum. We also extracted and sequenced DNA from substantia nigra using salting-out and phenol / chloroform. The mtDNA copy number, assessed by reads mapping to the mitochondrial genome, was higher in substantia nigra when using phenol / chloroform. We thus provide evidence for significant method-dependent bias in DNA isolation from human brain, as reported in rat tissues. This may contribute to array \"waves\", and could affect copy number determination, particularly if mosaicism is being sought, and sequencing coverage. Variations in isolation protocol may also affect apparent mtDNA abundance.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative analysis of nuclei isolation methods for brain single-nucleus RNA sequencing
Holly N. Kersey, Dominic J. Acri, … Jungsu Kim·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- Single-cell somatic copy number variants in brain using different amplification methods and reference genomes
Ester Kalef-Ezra, Zeliha Gözde Turan, … Christos Proukakis·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2024
- Selective isolation of mouse glial nuclei optimized for reliable downstream omics analyses
Miguel Ángel Peña-Ortiz, Sarfraz Shafiq, … Nathalie G. Bérubé·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2022
- Isolation of nuclei and downstream processing of cell-type-specific nuclei from micro-dissected mouse brain regions - techniques and caveats.
M. C. Chongtham, H. Todorov, … J. Winter·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Myelin-Free Nuclei Isolation from Mouse Hippocampus and Cerebellum for snRNA-Seq with Benchtop Gradient Centrifugation
Benu George, Braedon Q Kirkpatrick, … Qiang Zhang·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026
- Enzymatic dissociation induces transcriptional and proteotype bias in brain cell populations
Daniele Mattei, Andranik Ivanov, … Urs Meyer·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2020