Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicineAging Cell
Peer-reviewed journal article

Genetic associations for two biological age measures point to distinct aging phenotypes

Chia‐Ling KuoiD, Luke C. PillingiD, Zuyun LiuiD, Janice L. AtkinsiD, Morgan E. LevineiD

Abstract

Biological age measures outperform chronological age in predicting various aging outcomes, yet little is known regarding genetic predisposition. We performed genome-wide association scans of two age-adjusted biological age measures (PhenoAgeAcceleration and BioAgeAcceleration), estimated from clinical biochemistry markers1,2 in European-descent participants from UK Biobank. The strongest signals were found in the APOE gene, tagged by the two major protein-coding SNPs, PhenoAgeAccel--rs429358 (APOE e4 determinant) (p=1.50x10-72); BioAgeAccel--rs7412 (APOE e2 determinant) (p=3.16x10-60). Interestingly, we observed inverse APOE e2 and e4 associations and unique pathway enrichments when comparing the two biological age measures. Genes associated with BioAgeAccel were enriched in lipid related pathways, while genes associated with PhenoAgeAccel showed enrichment for immune system, cell function, and carbohydrate homeostasis pathways, suggesting the two measures capture different aging domains. Our study reaffirms that aging patterns are heterogenous across individuals, and the manner in which a person ages may be partly attributed to genetic predisposition.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISEllis '24Libert '25Macdonald-D '22Stevenson '19Harris '24Eissman '25
77% semantic matchSystems Biology
Dylan Ellis, Kengo Watanabe, Tomasz Maciej Wilmanski+16 more·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2024· 2 citations