A Comparative Study Of Endoderm Differentiation In Humans And Chimpanzees
Lauren E. BlakeiD, Samantha Marie ThomasiD, John BlischakiD, Chiaowen Joyce HsiaoiD, Claudia I. Chavarria, Marsha Myrthil, Yoav GiladiD, Bryan J. PavloviciD
Abstract
There is substantial interest in the evolutionary forces that shaped the regulatory framework that is established in early human development. Progress in this area has been slow because it is difficult to obtain relevant biological samples. Inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) provide the ability to establish in vitro models of early human and non-human primate developmental stages. Using matched iPSC panels from humans and chimpanzees, we comparatively characterized gene regulatory changes through a four-day timecourse differentiation of iPSCs (day 0) into primary streak (day 1), endoderm progenitors (day 2), and definitive endoderm (day 3). As might be expected, we found that differentiation stage is the major driver of variation in gene expression levels, followed by species. We identified thousands of differentially expressed genes between humans and chimpanzees in each differentiation stage. Yet, when we considered gene-specific dynamic regulatory trajectories throughout the timecourse, we found that 75.. of genes, including nearly all known endoderm developmental markers, have similar trajectories in the two species. Interestingly, we observed a marked reduction of both intra-and inter-species variation in gene expression levels in primitive streak samples compared to the iPSCs, with a recovery of regulatory variation in endoderm progenitors. The reduction of variation in gene expression levels at a specific developmental stage, paired with overall high degree of conservation of temporal gene regulation, is consistent with the dynamics of developmental canalization. Overall, we conclude that endoderm development in iPSC-based models are highly conserved and canalized between humans and our closest evolutionary relative.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generation of a Panel of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells From Chimpanzees: a Resource for Comparative Functional Genomics
Irene Gallego Romero, Bryan J. Pavlovic, … Yoav Gilad·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2014
- Evolutionary insights into primate skeletal gene regulation using a comparative cell culture model
Genevieve Housman, Emilie A. Briscoe, Yoav Gilad·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2022
- Interspecies Chimeric Conditions Affect the Developmental Rate of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
Jared Brown, Christopher Barry, … Christina M. Kendziorski·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2021
- Comparison of induced neurons reveals slower structural and functional maturation in humans than in apes
M. Schoernig, X. Ju, … E. Taverna·bioRxiv·May 21, 2020
- A Comparative Assessment of Human and Chimpanzee iPSC-derived Cardiomyocytes with Primary Heart Tissues
Bryan J. Pavlovic, Lauren E. Blake, … Yoav Gilad·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2018
- Genetic studies of human-chimpanzee divergence using stem cell fusions
J. H. Song, R. L. Grant, … D. M. Kingsley·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2021