henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

Cell-free DNA Fragmentation Profiling at Transcription Start Sites Improves upon Cancer-Type-Specific Region Selection for Cancer Detection

Bram PronkiD, Stavros MakrodimitrisiD, Saskia M. WiltingiD, Marcel J. T. ReindersiD

PDFDOICode

Abstract

MotivationAccurate discrimination between healthy individuals and patients with cancer using minimally invasive liquid biopsies could improve cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker, since fragmentation patterns reflect chromatin organization and have been used to interrogate regulatory regions such as transcription start sites (TSSs). Classification approaches typically rely on hypothesis-driven selection of genomic regions based on literature or external tissue data. Therefore, they assume that tumor-derived cfDNA constitutes the dominant diagnostic signal, potentially overlooking a systemic, genome-wide shift in the cfDNA pool. ResultsWe present a data-driven framework that identifies discriminative genomic loci directly from cfDNA whole-genome sequencing data. Using fragmentomic features captured at TSSs within a nested cross-validation framework, the model outperforms ichorCNA and hypothesis-driven baselines in distinguishing healthy from colorectal and breast cancer samples (AUROC 0.95 {+/-} 0.039). Performance was maintained in a pan-cancer setting across seven malignancies (AUROC 0.946 {+/-} 0.032) and generalized to previously unseen cancer types within the same cohorts (AUROC 0.934 {+/-} 0.006). While validation in an independent external cohort showed a performance gap (AUROC 0.694), the data-driven model was consistently competitive with baseline methods. These results indicate that robust cancer detection is enabled by integrating distributed genome-wide fragmentation patterns rather than restricting analysis to predefined regions. Availability and implementationScripts to reproduce the results are available at https://github.com/brmprnk/comp/ Contacti.b.pronk@tudelft.nl Supplementary informationavailable at NAR Online.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChe '22Zhou '20Mouhou '25Tran '24Zhang '26Zhang '23
73% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Huiwen Che, Tatjana Jatsenko, Liesbeth Lenaerts+26 more·Clinical Chemistry·Jun 29, 2022· 20 citations