Advancing childhood cancer research through young investigator and advocate collaboration
A. K. Weiner, A. Palmer, M. F. Moll, G. Lindberg, K. Reidy, S. J. Diskin, C. L. Mackall, J. M. Maris, P. J. Sullivan
Abstract
Cancer advocates and researchers share the same goal of driving science forward to create new therapies to cure more patients. The power of combining cancer researchers and advocates has become of increased importance due to their complementary expertise. Therefore, advocacy is a critical component of grant structures and has become embedded into the Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C) applications. To date, the optimal way to combine these skillsets and experiences to benefit the cancer community is currently unknown. The Saint Baldricks Foundation (SBF)-SU2C now called St. Baldricks Empowering Pediatric Immunotherapies for Childhood Cancer (EPICC) Team is comprised of a collaborative network across nine institutions in the United States and Canada. Since SU2C encourages incorporating advocacy into the team structure, we have assembled a diverse team of advocates and scientists by nominating a young investigator (YI) and advocate from each site. In order to further bridge this interaction beyond virtual monthly and yearly in person meetings, we have developed a questionnaire and conducted interviews. The questionnaire is focused on understanding each members experience at the intersection between science/advocacy, comparing to previous experiences, providing advice on incorporating advocacy into team science and discussing how we can build on our work. Through creating a YI and advocate infrastructure, we have cultivated a supportive environment for meaningful conversation that impacts the entire research team. We see this as a model for team science by combining expertise to drive innovation forward and positively impact pediatric cancer patients, and perhaps those with adult malignancies. SignificanceQuestionnaire results show both advocates and YIs see this structure to be valuable and beneficial. YIs communicated their research to a non-scientific audience and learned advocates experience. This was their first advocacy experience for most YIs. Advocates learned more about the research being conducted to provide hope. They can also aid with fundraising, publicity and lobbying. This collaboration improves science communication, designing patient-friendly clinical trials and sharing experience across institutions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of the capacity of Pediatricians in Nigeria to conduct of research: A nationwide Survey.
Maduka D. Ughasoro, Iliya Jalo, … Oguche Stephen·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- Building a virtual summer research experience in cancer for high school and early undergraduate students: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
T. W. Corson, S. M. Hawkins, … H. Nakshatri·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2020
- A comprehensive map of genetic interactions in childhood cancer reveals multiple underlying biological mechanisms
J. T. Daub, S. Amini, … P. Kemmeren·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2020
- Improved science communication and student gains from an undergraduate biomedical research experience
D. Ward, Y.-Y. Han, … M. L. Manni·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- Survey-Based Analysis of a Science of Science Communication Scientific Interest Group: Member Feedback and Perspectives on Science Communication
Anna J. Hilliard, Nicola Sugden, … Chris Gunter·Journal of Science CommunicationPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2025
- A video-based behavioural intervention associated with improved HPV knowledge and intention to vaccinate
S. Marshall, A. C. Moore, … L. Sahm·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2021