Sign in
GenomicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Systematic benchmarking of commercial workflows for isoform-resolved single-nucleus transcriptomics

Florian KöhleriD, Anna Delgado-TejedoriD, Maik ZehnsdorfiD, Marisol Salgado Albarran, Laura Zalba Jadraque, Irene González NavarreteiD, Luca CozzutoiD, Julia V. PonomarenkoiD, Berta Fuste PereziD

Abstract

Short-read sequencing-based single-cell transcriptomics represents the current gold standard for studying cellular transcriptomes but remains limited in its ability to resolve full-length transcript isoforms and splicing patterns. Long-read single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (LR sc/snRNA-seq) enables the transcriptome-wide characterization of full-length isoforms at cellular resolution, yet the relative performance of commercially available workflows remains insufficiently explored. Here, using nuclei extracted from a standardized multi-species benchmark sample and Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing, we systematically benchmarked four LR snRNA-seq strategies: 10x Genomics 3', 10x Genomics 5', ArgenTag, and Parse Biosciences. Comparing transcriptome features qualitatively and quantitatively, as well as the concordance with matched short-read data and the ability to resolve cellular heterogeneity, we identified substantial method-specific differences in read length and yield, transcript coverage, isoform detection, and recovery of sample-specific biological information, with the 10x Genomics 3' and 5' assays emerging as the most balanced approaches for comprehensive isoform-resolved single-nucleus transcriptomics. Altogether, our study provides a systematic assessment of four commercially available workflows for performing LR snRNA-seq and highlights key methodological trade-offs related to distinct library preparation strategies, thus providing practical guidance for future isoform-resolved transcriptome studies at the single-nucleus level.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHamraoui '26Yu '26Scoones '25Chen '25Xu '26Rebboah '21
73% semantic matchBioinformatics
Ali Hamraoui, Audrey Onfroy, Catherine Sénamaud‐Beaufort+4 more·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics·Jun 27, 2026· 2 citations