Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Oral Food Processing and Its Impact on Aroma Release
Isabelle AndriotiD, D. Grossiord, Noëlle Béno, Thibault ChabiniD, Hélène LabouréiD, Géraldine LucchiiD, Christophe MartiniD, O. Mourabit, José A. PiornosiD, L. Saint-Georges, Christian SallesiD, Ioan-Cristian TreleaiD, Caroline PeltieriD
Abstract
Aroma perception during food consumption results from the combined effects of food composition, oral processing (such as chewing and saliva action), the release and transport of volatile compounds toward the olfactory epithelium, followed by cognitive integration in the brain. Recent advances in real-time analytical techniques, particularly Proton Transfer Reaction-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS), enable in vivo monitoring of aroma release with high temporal resolution and have become widely used for analyzing the composition of exhaled air. However, the interpretation of aroma release kinetics remains challenging due to substantial intra- and inter-individual variability caused by differences in physiology, anatomy, oral behavior, and respiratory patterns. In this context, the present study was designed to quantify aroma release associated with different food oral processing (FOP) mechanisms, such as chewing and swallowing, using simple model matrices containing a single aroma compound, and to document inter- and intra-individual variability among subjects. Real-time PTR-MS measurements were combined with self-reported oral events and simultaneous respiratory monitoring to analyze aroma release from aqueous solutions and gummy discs flavored with isoamyl acetate. The results showed that inter-individual variability was higher than intra-individual variability and allowed its quantification in aroma release. Significant differences in aroma release kinetics were observed depending on FOP protocols. The importance of considering swallowing events when analyzing aroma release data was also highlighted.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modeling aroma release during in vivo food oral processing using digimouth
Caroline Peltier, O. Mourabit, … Ioan Cristian Trelea·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2026
- digimouth: a Python package for modeling aroma release in food science
Caroline Peltier, O. Mourabit, … Ioan-Cristian Trelea·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026
- Stimulation of saliva affects the release of aroma in wine; a study of microbiota, biochemistry and participant origin
Xinwei Ruan, Yipeng Chen, … Kate S. Howell·Journal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2024
- Retronasal Habituation: Characterization and Impact on Flavor Perception using Time-Intensity
Robert Pellegrino, Addison Atchley, … Curtis R. Luckett·Chemosensory PerceptionPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2018
- Odor sensory tests vs. In-silico prediction for the high-definition quantification of olfaction dynamics
Islam Mohamed Sayed Abouelhamd, Kazuki Kuga, … Kazuhide Ito·Sustainable Cities and SocietyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2025
- Variation of wine preference amongst consumers is influenced by the composition of salivary proteins