Pseudogene-mediated gene conversion after CRISPR-Cas9 editing demonstrated by partial CD33 conversion with SIGLEC22P
Abstract
Although gene editing workflows typically consider the possibility of off-target editing, pseudogene-directed homology repair has not, to our knowledge, been reported previously. Here, we employed a CRISPR-Cas9 strategy for targeted excision of exon 2 in CD33 in U937 human monocyte cell line. Candidate clonal cell lines were screened by using a clinically relevant antibody known to label the IgV domain encoded by exon 2 (P67.6, gemtuzumab). In addition to the anticipated deletion of exon 2, we also found unexpected P67.6-negative cell lines which had apparently retained CD33 exon 2. Sequencing revealed that these lines underwent gene conversion from the nearby SIGLEC22P pseudogene during homology repair that resulted in three missense mutations relative to CD33. Ectopic expression studies confirmed that the P67.6 epitope is dependent upon these amino acids. In summation, we report that pseudogene-directed homology repair can lead to aberrant CRISPR gene editing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient repair of human homozygous genetic mutation by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated interlocus gene conversion
Fei Yang, Jingtao Pang, … Yuxuan Wu·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022
- Allele-specific correction of ATAD3A pathogenic variants via template-free CRISPR-Cas9 editing and gene conversion
Taejeong Bae, Yohan Park, … Wan Hee Yoon·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2025
- Pervasive head-to-tail insertions of DNA templates mask desired CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing events
Boris V. Skryabin, Delf-Magnus Kummerfeld, … Timofey S. Rozhdestvensky·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2020
- Rapid genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9-POLD3 fusion
Ganna Reint, Zhuokun Li, … Emma Haapaniemi·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Clonally selected lines after CRISPR/Cas editing are not isogenic
Arijit Panda, Milovan Šuvakov, … Alexej S. Abyzov·The CRISPR JournalPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2023
- "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo" are most likely pre-existing sequence variants and not nuclease-induced mutations
Caleb A. Lareau, Kendell Clement, … Luca Pinello·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2018