Uncovering novel mutational signatures by de novo extraction with SigProfilerExtractor
S. M. Ashiqul IslamiD, Marcos Díaz‐GayiD, Yang WuiD, Mark D. BarnesiD, Raviteja VangaraiD, Erik N. BergstromiD, Yudou HeiD, Mike Vella, Jingwei WangiD, Jon W. TeagueiD, Peter Clapham, Sarah MoodyiD, Sergey SenkiniD, Yun Rose LiiD, Laura RivaiD, Tongwu ZhangiD, Andreas J GruberiD, Christopher D. SteeleiD, Burçak OtluiD, Azhar KhandekariD, Ammal AbbasiiD, Laura HumphreysiD, Natalia Siuliukina, Samuel W. BradyiD, Boian S. AlexandroviD, , Ludmil B. AlexandroviD
Abstract
Mutational signature analysis is commonly performed in genomic studies surveying cancer and normal somatic tissues. Here we present SigProfilerExtractor, an automated tool for accurate de novo extraction of mutational signatures for all types of somatic mutations. Benchmarking with a total of 34 distinct scenarios encompassing 2,500 simulated signatures operative in more than 60,000 unique synthetic genomes and 20,000 synthetic exomes demonstrates that SigProfilerExtractor outperforms thirteen other tools across all datasets with and without noise. For genome simulations with 5% noise, reflecting high-quality genomic datasets, SigProfilerExtractor outperforms other approaches by elucidating between 20% and 50% more true positive signatures while yielding more than 5-fold less false positive signatures. Applying SigProfilerExtractor to 4,643 whole-genome sequenced and 19,184 whole-exome sequenced cancers reveals four previously missed mutational signatures. Two of the signatures are confirmed in independent cohorts with one of these signatures associating with tobacco smoking. In summary, this report provides a reference tool for analysis of mutational signatures, a comprehensive benchmarking of bioinformatics tools for extracting mutational signatures, and several novel mutational signatures including a signature putatively attributed to direct tobacco smoking mutagenesis in bladder cancer and in normal bladder epithelium.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 369
- FWCI
- 31.68
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment
Marcos Díaz‐Gay, Raviteja Vangara, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2023
- Computational tools to detect signatures of mutational processes in DNA from tumours: a review and empirical comparison of performance
Hanane Omichessan, Gianluca Severi, Vittorio Perduca·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2019
- MutSignatures: An R Package for Extraction and Analysis of Cancer Mutational Signatures
Damiano Fantini, Vania Vidimar, … Joshua J. Meeks·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2020
- Sigflow: an automated and comprehensive pipeline for cancer genome mutational signature analysis
Shixiang Wang, Ziyu Tao, … Xuesong Liu·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 3, 2020
- CANCERSIGN: a user-friendly and robust tool for identification and classification of mutational signatures and patterns in cancer genomes
Masroor Bayati, Hamid Reza Rabiee, … Hamid Alinejad‐Rokny·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2020
- Accurate and sensitive mutational signature analysis with MuSiCal
Hu Jin, D. Gulhan, … Peter J. Park·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024