Sex differences in cognitive performance, style and domain relationships in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis)
Abstract
Given that the sexes often differ in their ecological and sexual selection pressures, sex differences in cognitive properties are likely. While research on sexually dimorphic cognitionoften focuses on performance, it commonly overlooks how sexes diverge across multiple cognitive tasks (cognitive domains) and in behaviors associated with cognitive performance (cognitive style). We tested male and female western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) in three cognitive tasks: associative learning (numerical discrimination), cognitive flexibility (detour task), and spatio-temporal learning (shuttlebox). We characterized statistical relationships between cognitive performances and cognitive style during the associative learning task with measures of anxiety, boldness, exploration, reaction time, and activity. We found sex differences in performance, cognitive style, and the relationships between cognitive domains. Females outperformed males in spatio-temporal learning task, while the sexes performed equally in associate learning and cognitive flexibility assays. Females (but not males) exhibited a fast-exploratory cognitive style during associative learning trials. Meanwhile, only males showed a significant positive relationship between domains (associative learning and cognitive flexibility). We propose that these sexually dimorphic cognitive traits result from strong sexual conflict in this taxon; and emphasize the need to explore suites of sex-specific cognitive traits and broader comparative work examining sexual selection and cognition. HighlightsO_LIMales and females perform at similar levels in associative learning and cognitive flexibility assays, but females tend to outperform males on a spatio-temporal learning task. C_LIO_LIFemale performance in associative learning trials (numerical discrimination task) can be predicted by cognitive style behaviors (exploration, reaction time, and activity); whereas male performance cannot. C_LIO_LIMales, but not females, show a predictive relationship between associative learning and cognitive flexibility performance. C_LIO_LIOur results demonstrate that sex differences in cognition extend beyond performance into cognitive style and domain relationships, suggesting that investigations into animal personality and cognition require more comprehensive characterization. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Equal performance but distinct behaviors: Astatotilapia burtoni sex differences in a novel object recognition task and spatial maze
K. J. Wallace, H. A. Hofmann·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2020
- Sex-biased computations underlying differential set shift performance in mice
Nic Glewwe, Evan M. Dastin-van Rijn, … Nicola M. Grissom·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2026
- Lack of evidence for sex differences in higher cognitive function in macaques
Jamie Nagy, Christienne G. Damatac, … Paula L. Croxson·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2017
- Cognition and brain gene expression vary with sex and body size in a polyphenic dung beetle (Onthophagus taurus)
Rebecca R. Westwick, Armin P. Moczek·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- Sexual selection and the evolution of male and female cognition: a test using experimental evolution in seed beetles
J. Baur, J. d'Amour, D. Berger·EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2019
- Sex differences in task engagement and lapse rate during reward learning
Claudia G. Aguirre, Jae Hyung Woo, … Alicia Izquierdo·Oxford Open NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026