Unveiling protist composition and diversity patterns with eDNA metabarcoding: comparing short- and long-read approaches
Dimitra‐Ioli SkouroliakouiD, Deborah W. E. DupontiD, Yelle VandenboeriD, Sofie D'hont, K. Sabbe, Isa SchöniD
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a key tool in biodiversity monitoring due to its high-throughput, non-destructive nature. While short-read (SR) sequencing platforms such as Illumina Miseq have been routinely used in environmental monitoring, their limited read lengths (less than 600 bp) constrain the depth of taxonomic assignment, particularly for complex microbial eukaryotes like protists. Conversely, long-read (LR) sequencing technologies like Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offer promising alternatives but remain underutilized for studying protist communities. We conducted a comparative study of SR versus LR metabarcoding of protist communities along a coastal-offshore gradient in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Using amplicons targeting the V4 region (SR; 577 bp) and the V4-V5 region (LR; 745 bp) of the 18S rRNA gene, we compared diversity patterns, taxonomic assignment, and community composition between approaches. We observed general congruence in community composition at higher taxonomic levels, but under the applied workflows, LR metabarcoding yielded a greater depth of taxonomic annotation at lower taxonomic ranks. Notably, dinoflagellates were less overrepresented in LR data, and a unique detection of potential nuisance taxa (e.g., Bellerochea), and ecologically important genera such as haptophytes (e.g., Gephyrocapsa) was achieved. These results highlight the potential of LR metabarcoding to complement SR approaches by providing increased taxonomic annotation depth and ecological insights. Although both methods targeted only partial regions of the 18S rRNA gene, LR metabarcoding yielded a greater depth of taxonomic assignment under the applied workflows. As next-generation sequencing technologies continue to evolve, our research provides valuable insights for selecting optimal strategies in routine plankton monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From short to long reads: enhanced protist diversity profiling via Nanopore metabarcoding
Małgorzata Chwalińska, Michał Karlicki, … Anna Karnkowska·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2025
- Resolving eukaryotic river biofilm communities using long-read sequencing for biomonitoring
Meri A. J. Anderson, Amy C. Thorpe, … Daniel S. Read·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026
- The long and the short of it: Nanopore based eDNA metabarcoding of marine vertebrates works; sensitivity and specificity depend on amplicon lengths
Karlijn Doorenspleet, Max Janse, … Reindert Nijland·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2025
- Long-read DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal rRNA in the analysis of fungi from aquatic environments
F. Heeger, E. C. Bourne, … M. T. Monaghan·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2018
- An assessment of environmental metabarcoding protocols aiming at favouring contemporary biodiversity in inventories of deep-sea communities
Miriam I. Brandt, Blandine Trouche, … Sophie Arnaud‐Haond·Frontiers in Marine SciencePeer-reviewed·May 8, 2020
- Long-range PCR amplification and nanopore sequencing of 8-10 kb mitochondrial fragments from environmental DNA
Stephanie A. Matthews, Olivia M. Scott, … Ryan P. Kelly·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2026