Factors associated with sharing email information and mental health survey participation in two large population cohorts
Mark J. AdamsiD, William David HilliD, David M. HowardiD, Hassan S. DashtiiD, Katrina A. S. DavisiD, Archie I CampbelliD, Toni‐Kim ClarkeiD, Ian J. DearyiD, Caroline HaywardiD, David John PorteousiD, Matthew H. HotopfiD, Andrew Mark McIntoshiD
Abstract
People who opt to participate in scientific studies tend to be healthier, wealthier, and more educated than the broader population. While selection bias does not always pose a problem for analysing the relationships between exposures and diseases or other outcomes, it can lead to biased effect size estimates. Biased estimates may weaken the utility of genetic findings because the goal is often to make inferences in a new sample (such as in polygenic risk score analysis). We used data from UK Biobank and Generation Scotland and conducted phenotypic and genome-wide association analyses on two phenotypes that reflected mental health data availability: (1) whether participants were contactable by email for follow-up) and (2) whether participants responded to a follow-up surveys of mental health. We identified nine genetic loci associated with email contact and 25 loci associated with mental health survey completion. Both phenotypes were positively genetically correlated with higher educational attainment and better health and negatively genetically correlated with psychological distress and schizophrenia. Recontact availability and follow-up participation can act as further genetic filters for data on mental health phenotypes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 83
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank
Jessica Tyrrell, Jie Zheng, … Kate M. Tilling·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2021
- The Genetics of Participation: Method and Analysis
Stefania Benónísdóttir, Augustine Kong·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2023
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses
Tabea Schoeler, Doug Speed, … Zoltán Kutalik·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2023
- Patterns of item nonresponse behavior to survey questionnaires are systematic and have a genetic basis
Gianmarco Mignogna, Caitlin E. Carey, … Andrea Ganna·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2022
- The molecular genetics of participation in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
Amy E. Taylor, Hannah J Jones, … Kate M. Tilling·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2018
- Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: Results from a schizophrenia sample
Rose Mary Xavier, Yuktha Shanavas, … Wales T. George·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2023