FLASH radiotherapy using high-energy X-rays: validation of the FLASH effect triggered by a compact single high-energy X-ray source device
Binwei Lin, Huan Du, Yiwei YangiD, Xiaofei Hao, Feng GaoiD, Yuwen Liang, Wenqiang TangiD, Haonan XuiD, Mingming TangiD, Yao Liao, Decai WangiD, Bo LiniD, Yihan ZhuiD, Tingting WangiD, Runqiu GuiD, Xin Mao, Yixiao He, Yu ZhangiD, Jie LiiD, Zheng ZhouiD, Jianxin WangiD, Dai WuiD, Xiaobo DuiD
Abstract
PurposeThis preclinical study aimed to verify the FLASH effect of compact single high-energy X-ray source (CHEXs) and to explore whether three irradiations with single-gantry rotation two 30 s pauses can generate FLASH effect in mice. Materials and methodsThe absolute dose and pulsed beam of the CHEXs were measured using an EBTXD radiochromic film and fast current transformer. Healthy C57BL/6J female mice and a subcutaneous tumor model were irradiated under different conditions: sham (control), FLASH-RT (FLASH1: delivering the total dose in 1 fraction; FLASH3: delivering the total dose with two 30 second pauses to simulate a three-field delivery where the gantry rotation is occurring within 30 seconds), and conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV-RT). Various total doses were administered to the corresponding normal tissues (whole thorax, 30 Gy; whole abdomen, 12 Gy; and skin, 36 Gy) and tumors (CT26, 16.5 Gy; and LLC, 18 Gy). Survival status, normal tissue damage, and tumor growth suppression were recorded in each group. ResultsThe average dose rate of the CHEXs exceeded 40 Gy/s. For whole-thorax and skin irradiation, both FLASH1 and FLASH3 demonstrated protective effects. For whole-abdomen irradiation, FLASH1 exhibited a superior protective effect. No significant differences in tumor growth responses were observed between the FLASH1, FLASH3, and CONV-RT groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThis study confirmed that the FLASH effect could be triggered using CHEXs FLASH radiotherapy, and demonstrated that three irradiations with single gantry rotation two 30 s pauses can trigger the FLASH effect, indicating the potential benefit of CHEXs 3D conformal radiotherapy. Our findings indicate that further clinical trials on CHEXs are warranted.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- First demonstration of the FLASH effect with ultrahigh dose-rate high-energy X-rays
- Decrease in dose per fraction impairs the FLASH sparing effect in murine intestine model
Anouk Sesink, R. Geyer, … Veljko Grilj·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2025
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer
Stavros Melemenidis, Vignesh Viswanathan, … Frederick M. Dirbas·CancersPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2025
- FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, mitigates chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.
Ioannis I. Verginadis, Anastasia P. Velalopoulou, … Theresa M. Busch·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- FLASH or flare: variable intestinal toxicity results in a mouse model following proton pencil beam scanning irradiation on a clinical superconducting synchrocyclotron
Eva Bogaerts, Ellina Macaeva, … Edmond Sterpin·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract
Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, … Emil Schüler·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2024