Mucosal washes are useful for sampling intestinal mucus-associated microbiota despite low biomass
Jennifer N. Martínez-MedinaiD, Fereshteh Ghazisaeedi, Catharina KrameriD, J ZiegleriD, Victoria J. McParlandiD, Paul Wilhelm MönchiD, Britta SiegmundiD, Víctor Hugo Jarquín‐DíaziD, Marcus FuldeiD, Sofia Kirke ForslundiD
Abstract
Exploring the dynamic relationship between mucus-associated microbiota and host health is pivotal, yet prevalent studies using stool samples may not accurately represent these bacteria. Here, we explored mucus-associated microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of mice and the terminal ileum in humans, using three different sample types: mucosal washes, scraping, and intestinal content in mice and biopsies and mucosal washes in humans. We employed DNA quantification and 16S rRNA sequencing to assess how comparable the information yielded from different sample types, evaluating findings relative to expectations from state-of-the-art and under controlled benchmarks. Mucosal washes in mice exhibited higher bacterial DNA and lower host DNA contamination than scraping samples. Similarly, in humans, washes surpassed biopsies in bacterial yield. Despite variations in read counts, microbiota diversity and composition remained remarkably similar between methods in both species, faithfully reflecting expected genotypic and phenotypic differences. We conclude that washes reduce host contamination without inducing substantial compositional bias when sampling mucosal microbiota. Our findings emphasize mucosal washes as alternatives to biopsies in humans and scrapings in mice, providing insights for improving result transferability across hosts. Our research underscores the importance of considering the mucus-associated microbiota to track host-microbiome interactions closer to their actual interface surface.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 43%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples
S. Sun, X. Zhu, … A. A. Fodor·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2021
- A Novel Approach Towards Less Invasive Multi 'Omics Gut Analyses: A Pilot Study
A. J. Berlinberg, A. Brar, … K. A. Kuhn·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2021
- Application of an ecology-based analytic approach to discriminate signal and noise in low-biomass microbiome studies: whole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota
J. M. Baker, K. J. Hinkle, … R. P. Dickson·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2020
- Natural and after colon washing fecal samples: the two sides of the coin for investigating the human gut microbiome
Elisabetta Piancone, Bruno Fosso, … Graziano Pesole·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2022
- The impact of kit, environment and sampling contamination on the observed microbiome of bovine milk
C. J. Dean, Y. Deng, … N. Noyes·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2023
- Rectal swabs in critically-ill patients provide discordant representations of the gut microbiome compared to stool samples: a brief methodologic report.
K. Fair, D. G. Dunlap, … G. D. Kitsios·bioRxiv·May 18, 2019