henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of VirologyMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

The influence of the pre-membrane and envelope proteins on structure, pathogenicity and tropism of tick-borne encephalitis virus

Ebba RosendaliD, Kyrylo BisikaloiD, Stefanie M. A. WillekensiD, Marie LindgreniD, Jiří HoloubekiD, Pavel SvobodaiD, Amanda LappalaineniD, Ebba Könighofer, Ekaterina E. MirgorodskayaiD, Rickard NordéniD, Federico MoriniiD, William RosenbaumiD, Daniel RůžekiD, Ulf AhlgreniD, Maria AnastasinaiD, Andres MeritsiD, Sarah J. ButcheriD, Emma NilssoniD, Anna K. ÖverbyiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a neurotropic flavivirus that causes thousands of human infections annually. Viral tropism in the brain is determined by the presence of necessary receptors, entry factors and the ability of the virus to overcome host defenses. The viral structural proteins, pre-membrane (prM) and envelope (E), play an important role in receptor binding, membrane fusion, particle maturation, and antibody neutralization. To understand how these proteins influence virus distribution and tropism in the brain, we generated a chimeric virus harboring the prM and ectodomain of E from TBEV in the background of the low pathogenic Langat virus (LGTV). We solved the atomic structures of both the chimeric virus and LGTV to compare them to the known TBEV structure. We show that this chimeric virus remains low-pathogenic, while being structurally and antigenically similar to TBEV. Using 3D optical whole brain imaging combined with immunohistochemistry, we found that both LGTV and the chimeric virus primarily infect cerebral cortex, with no significant differences in their localization or tropism. In contrast, TBEV shows high infection of the cerebellum and strong preference towards Purkinje cells, indicating that the non-structural proteins are important for determining TBEV tropism in the brain. Together, this provides new insights into the roles of the structural and non-structural proteins of tick-borne flaviviruses.

Citations
7
FWCI
5.31
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.