GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes after Gene Editing through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing
Zi-Jun QuaniD, Si-Ang LiiD, Zhi-Xue YangiD, Juan-Juan ZhaoiD, Guohua LiiD, Feng ZhangiD, Wei WeniD, Tao ChengiD, Xiao‐Bing ZhangiD
Abstract
To achieve the enormous potential of gene-editing technology in clinical therapies, both the on-target and unintended editing consequences need to be thoroughly evaluated. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive, pipelined, large-scale and economical workflow for detecting genome editing outcomes, in particular insertion or deletion of a large fragment. Here, we describe an approach for efficient and accurate detection of multiple genetic changes after CRISPR-Cas9 editing by pooled nanopore sequencing of barcoded long-range PCR products. To overcome the high error rates and indels of nanopore sequencing, we developed a pipeline to capture the barcoded sequences by grepping reads of nanopore amplicon sequencing (GREPore-seq). GREPore-seq can detect NHEJ-mediated double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (dsODN) insertions with comparable accuracy to Illumina next-generation sequencing (NGS). GREPore-seq also identifies HDR-mediated large gene knock-in, which excellently correlates with FACS analysis data. Low-level plasmid backbone insertion after HDR editing was also detected. We have established a practical workflow to identify genetic changes, including quantifying dsODN insertions, knock-ins, plasmid backbone insertions, and large fragment deletions after CRISPR editing. This toolkit for nanopore sequencing of pooled long amplicons should have broad applications in assessing on-target HDR editing and inadvertent large indels of over 1 kb. GREPore-seq is freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/lisiang/GREPore-seq).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Field percentile
- top 26%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- NANOCUTSIGHT: A NANOPORE-SEQUENCING APPROACH AND ANALYSIS PIPELINE TO ASSESS GENOME EDITING EFFICACY IN VARIOUS CELL POPULATIONS
Danny Bergeron, Véronique Gaudreault, … Steve Jean·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2026
- Verification of CRISPR editing and finding transgenic inserts by Xdrop Indirect sequence capture followed by short- and long- read sequencing
Blondal Thorarinn, Gamba Cristina, … Mouritzen Peter·bioRxiv·May 28, 2020
- RGEN-SEQ FOR HIGHLY SENSITIVE AMPLIFICATION-FREE SCREEN OF OFF-TARGET SITES OF GENE EDITORS
A. Kuzin, Brendan Redler, … Alexei I. Slesarev·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2021
- Application of long-read sequencing for robust identification of correct alleles in genome edited animals
Christopher V. McCabe, Peter D. Price, … Lydia Teboul·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2024
- CRISPResso: sequencing analysis toolbox for CRISPR genome editing
Luca Pinello, Matthew C Canver, … Guo-Cheng Yuan·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2016
- INSERT-seq enables high resolution mapping of genomically integrated DNA using nanopore sequencing
Dimitrije Ivančić, Júlia Mir-Pedrol, … Marc Güell·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2022