bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Verification of CRISPR editing and finding transgenic inserts by Xdrop Indirect sequence capture followed by short- and long- read sequencing
Blondal Thorarinn, Gamba Cristina, Jagd Lea Møller, Su Ling, Demirov Dimiter, Guo Shuang, Camille M. Johnston, Eva M. Riising, Wu Xiaolin, Marie J. Mikkelsen, Szabova Ludmila, Mouritzen Peter
Abstract
Validation of CRISPR-Cas9 editing typically explore the immediate vicinity of the gene editing site and distal off-target sequences, which have led to the conclusion that CRISPR-Cas9 editing is very specific. However, an increasing number of studies suggest that on-target unintended editing events like deletions and insertions are relatively frequent but unfortunately often missed in the validation of CRISPR-Cas9 editing. The deletions may be several kilobases-long and only affect one allele. The gold standard in molecular validation of gene editing is direct sequencing of relatively short PCR amplicons. This approach allows the detection of small editing events but fails in detecting large rearrangements, in particular when only one allele is affected. Detection of large rearrangements requires that an extended region is analyzed and the characterization of events may benefit from long-read sequencing. Here we implemented Xdrop, a new microfluidic technology that allows targeted enrichment of long regions (~ 100 kb) using just a single standard PCR primer set. Sequencing of the enriched CRISPR-Cas9 gene edited region in 4 cell lines on long- and short -read sequencing platforms unravelled unknown and unintended genome editing events. The analysis revealed accidental kb large insertions in 3 of the cell lines, which remained undetected using standard procedures. We also applied the targeted enrichment approach to identify the integration site of a transgene in a mouse line. The results demonstrate the potential of this technology in gene editing validation as well as in more classic transgenics.
- organism: mouse
- assay: long-read sequencing
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: deconvolution
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Complex deletion and proximal reinsertion of a 150bp regulatory sequence in the mouse Csf1r promoter mediated by CRISPR-Cas9.
KIM M. SUMMERS, Clare Pridans, … David Arthur Hume·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2019
- GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes after Gene Editing through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing
Zi-Jun Quan, Si-Ang Li, … Xiao‐Bing Zhang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2022
- Application of long-read sequencing for robust identification of correct alleles in genome edited animals
Christopher V. McCabe, Peter D. Price, … Lydia Teboul·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2024
- Pervasive head-to-tail insertions of DNA templates mask desired CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing events
Boris V. Skryabin, Delf-Magnus Kummerfeld, … Timofey S. Rozhdestvensky·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2020
- Long-read sequence analysis of MMEJ-mediated CRISPR genome editing reveals complex on-target vector insertions that may escape standard PCR-based quality control
Yuki Higashitani, Kyoji Horie·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2023
- Detailed mechanisms for unintended large DNA deletions with CRISPR, base editors, and prime editors
Gue‐Ho Hwang, Seok‐Hoon Lee, … Sangsu Bae·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2024