Post-translational modifications of Drosophila melanogaster HOX protein, Sex combs reduced
Abstract
Homeotic selector (HOX) transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression that determines the identity of Drosophila segments along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis. The current challenge with HOX proteins is understanding how they achieve their functional specificity while sharing a highly conserved homeodomain (HD) that recognize the same DNA binding sites. One mechanism proposed to regulate HOX activity is differential post-translational modification (PTM). As a first step in investigating this hypothesis, the sites of PTM on a Sex combs reduced protein fused to a triple tag (SCRTT) extracted from developing embryos were identified by Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS). The PTMs identified include phosphorylation at S185, S201, T315, S316, T317 and T324, acetylation at K218, S223, S227, K309, K434 and K439, formylation at K218, K309, K325, K341, K369, K434 and K439, methylation at S19, S166, K168 and T364, carboxylation at D108, K298, W307, K309, E323, K325 and K369, and hydroxylation at P22, Y87, P107, D108, D111, P269, P306, R310, N321, K325, Y334, R366, P392 and Y398. Of the 44 modifications, 18 map to functionally important regions of SCR. Besides a highly conserved DNA-binding HD, HOX proteins also have functionally important, evolutionarily conserved small motifs, which may be Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs). SLiMs are proposed to be preferential sites of phosphorylation. Although 6 of 7 phosphosites map to regions of predicted SLiMs, we find no support for the hypothesis that the individual S, T and Y residues of predicted SLiMs are phosphorylated more frequently than S, T and Y residues outside of predicted SLiMs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila
Arya Zandvakili, Juli D. Uhl, … Brian A. Gebelein·Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2018
- Genome-wide Ultrabithorax binding analysis reveals highly targeted genomic loci at developmental regulators and a potential connection to Polycomb-mediated regulation
Daria Shlyueva, Antonio C.A. Meireles-Filho, … Alexander Stark·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2016
- Transcription factor paralogs orchestrate alternative gene regulatory networks by context-dependent cooperation with multiple cofactors
Siqian Feng, Chaitanya Rastogi, … Richard S. Mann·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- Ambivalent partnership of the Drosophila posterior class Hox protein Abdominal-B with the Extradenticle and Homothorax cofactors
Jesús Rodríguez Curt, Paloma Martín, … Ernesto Sánchez‐Herrero·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2025
- Characterisation of the role and regulation of Ultrabithorax in sculpting fine-scale leg morphology
Alexandra D. Buffry, Sebastian Kittelmann, Alistair P. McGregor·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2023
- Genome-wide binding of posterior HOXA/D transcription factors reveals subgrouping and association with CTCF
Ivana Jerković, Daniel Murad Ibrahim, … Stefan Mundlos·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2017