Invertebrate methylomes provide insight into mechanisms of environmental tolerance and reveal methodological biases
Shelly A. Trigg, Yaamini R. VenkataramaniD, Mackenzie R. GaveryiD, Steven RobertsiD, Debashish BhattacharyaiD, Alan M. Downey‐WalliD, Jose Maria Eirin-LopeziD, Kevin M. JohnsoniD, Katie E. LotterhosiD, Jonathan B. PuritziD, Hollie M. PutnamiD
Abstract
There is a growing focus on the role of DNA methylation in the ability of marine invertebrates to rapidly respond to changing environmental factors and anthropogenic impacts. However, genome-wide DNA methylation studies in non-model organisms are currently hampered by limited understanding of methodological biases. Here we compare three methods for quantifying DNA methylation at single base-pair resolution -- Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS), Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS), and Methyl-CpG Binding Domain Bisulfite Sequencing (MBDBS) -- using multiple individuals from two reef-building coral species with contrasting environmental sensitivity. All methods reveal substantially greater methylation in Montipora capitata (11.4%) than the more sensitive Pocillopora acuta (2.9%). The majority of CpG methylation in both species occurs in gene bodies and flanking regions. In both species, MBDBS has the greatest capacity for detecting CpGs in coding regions at our sequencing depth, however MBDBS may be influenced by intra-sample methylation heterogeneity. RRBS yields robust information for specific loci albeit without enrichment of any particular genome feature and with significantly reduced genome coverage. Relative genome size strongly influences the number and location of CpGs detected by each method when sequencing depth is limited, illuminating nuances in cross-species comparisons. As genome-wide methylation differences, supported by data across bisulfite sequencing methods, may contribute to environmental sensitivity phenotypes in critical marine invertebrate taxa, these data provide a genomic resource for investigating the functional role of DNA methylation in environmental tolerance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Field percentile
- top 22%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking DNA Methylation Assays for Marine Invertebrates
G. Dixon, M. V. Matz·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2020
- DNA methylation estimation using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme bisulfite sequencing (MREBS)
Giancarlo Bonora, Liudmilla Rubbi, … Matteo A. Pellegrini·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2019
- Tissue-specific plasticity of DNA methylation across intertidal microhabitats in juvenile mussels (Mytilus californianus)
Qiting Cai, Samuel N. Bogan, … W. Wesley Dowd·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2026
- Variable performance of widely used bisulfite sequencing methods and read mapping software for DNA methylation
Emily V Kerns, Jesse N. Weber·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2025
- Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding detects suites of environmental gradients from an urban harbour
Chloe Victoria Robinson, Teresita M. Porter, … Mehrdad Hajibabaei·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2022
- Comparative analysis of the Illumina Mouse Methylation BeadChip and Reduced Representation Bisulphite Sequencing for routine DNA methylation analysis of murine samples
Lochlan Fennell, Günter Härtel, … Vicki Whitehall·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022