Scientific ReportsMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Optimizing Tissue Lysis and DNA Extraction Protocols to Enhance Bacterial Diversity Profiling in the Drosophila melanogaster Gut Microbiome
Carlos L. Quiñones-SancheziD, Jan L. Bilbao-Del Valle, Miguel A. Urdaneta-Colon, Tasha M. Santiago-Rodriguez, Imilce A. Rodriguez‐FernandeziD
Abstract
The gut microbiota is a dynamic community that influences host metabolism, immunity, and overall health. Accurate characterization of this community requires robust and reproducible DNA extraction methods; however, technical biases introduced during tissue lysis and DNA isolation remain major challenges in microbiome research, particularly in animal model systems. In this study, we compared two commercial DNA extraction kits (Qiagen and Zymo) and two lysis methods (manual pestle homogenization and bead-beating) to evaluate their impact on microbiota profiling in a microbial community standard (MCS) and Drosophila melanogaster gut samples, a tractable model for host-microbe interactions. Full-length 16S rRNA sequencing was performed using Oxford Nanopore Technologies, followed by bioinformatic analysis using EPI2ME for taxonomic classification and standard diversity pipelines. Our data revealed that extraction and lysis methods significantly influence microbial composition, with some protocols resulting in inflated richness in MCS samples. Pestle homogenization with the Qiagen kit yielded the highest bacterial species richness while maintaining consistent representation of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative taxa. These findings demonstrate that extraction methodology strongly affects microbial diversity estimates and emphasize the need for standardized protocols to ensure reproducibility across microbiome studies, particularly those using model systems.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines
Q. R. Ducarmon, B. B. V. H. Hornung, … R. D. Zwittink·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2019
- Use of Metagenomic Reference Materials to Compare Lysis and Extraction Methods Against a Known Input
Michael M. Weinstein, Braden T. Tierney, … Christopher E. Mason·bioRxiv·Jan 2, 2026
- Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types
M. E. C. Abundo, J. Ngunjiri, … L. Chang-Won·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- Comprehensive Metagenomic Profiling of Diverse Microbiomes
Balázs Kakuk, Ákos Dörmő, … Dóra Tombácz·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2025
- Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples
M. L. Wright, J. Podnar, … D. Wylie·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2023
- Impact of Sample Type and DNA Isolation Procedure on Genomic Inference of Microbiome Composition
Berith E Knudsen, Lasse Bergmark, … Sunje J Pamp·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2016