Mutation is a sufficient and robust predictor of genetic variation for mitotic spindle traits in C. elegans
Reza Farhadifar, Jose Miguel Ponciano, Erik C Andersen, Daniel J Needleman, Charles F Baer
Abstract
Different types of phenotypic traits consistently exhibit different levels of genetic variation in natural populations. There are two potential explanations: either mutation produces genetic variation at different rates, or natural selection removes or promotes genetic variation at different rates. Whether mutation or selection is of greater general importance is a longstanding unresolved question in evolutionary genetics. Where the input of genetic variation by mutation differs between traits, it is usually uncertain whether the difference is the result of different mutational effects (\"mutational robustness\") or different numbers of underlying loci (\"mutational target\"), although conventional wisdom favors the latter. We report mutational variances (VM) for 19 traits related to the first mitotic cell division in C. elegans, and compare them to the standing genetic variances (VG) for the same suite of traits in a worldwide collection C. elegans. Two robust conclusions emerge. First, the mutational process is highly repeatable: the correlation between VM in two independent sets of mutation accumulation lines is ~0.9. Second, VM for a trait is a very good predictor of VG for that trait: the correlation between VM and VG is ~0.9. This result is predicted for a population at mutation-selection balance; it is not predicted if balancing selection plays a primary role in maintaining genetic variation. Goodness- of-fit of the data to two simple models of mutation suggest that differences in mutational effects may be a more important cause of differences in VM between traits than differences in the size of the mutational target.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variation in mutational (co)variances
F. Mallard, L. Noble, … H. Teotonio·bioRxiv·May 28, 2022
- Evolution of the mutational process under relaxed selection in Caenorhabditis elegans
A. S. Saxena, M. P. Salomon, … C. F. Baer·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2018
- Causes of variability in estimates of mutational variance from mutation accumulation experiments
Cara Conradsen, Mark W. Blows, Katrina McGuigan·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2022
- A broad mutational target explains an evolutionary trend
F. Besnard, J. Picao-Osorio, … M.-A. Felix·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019
- Evolution of the rate, spectrum, and fitness effects of mutation under minimal selection in Caenorhabditis elegans
Sayran Saber, Md. Monjurul Islam Rifat, … Charles F. Baer·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2026
- Natural variation in C. elegans short tandem repeats
Gaotian Zhang, Ye Wang, Erik C. Andersen·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2022