henhaobio
Sign in

Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Analysis of skull thickness, scalp-to-cortex distance and association with age and sex in cognitively normal elderly

Junhao ZhangiD, Valérie TreyeriD, Junfeng SuniD, Chencheng ZhangiD, Anton Franz GietliD, Christoph Höck, Daniel RazanskyiD, Roger M. Nitsch, Ruiqing NiiD, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Personalized neurostimulation has been a potential treatment for many brain diseases, which requires insights into brain/skull geometry. Here, we developed an open source efficient pipeline BrainCalculator for automatically computing the skull thickness map, scalp-to-cortex distance (SCD), and brain volume based on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We examined the influence of age and sex cross-sectionally in 407 cognitively normal older adults (71.9{+/-}8.0 years, 60.2% female) from the ADNI. We demonstrated the compatibility of our pipeline with commonly used preprocessing packages and found that BrainSuite Skullfinder was better suited for such automatic analysis compared to FSL Brain Extraction Tool 2 and SPM12- based unified segmentation using ground truth. We found that the sphenoid bone and temporal bone were thinnest among the skull regions in both females and males. There was no increase in regional minimum skull thickness with age except in the female sphenoid bone. No sex difference in minimum skull thickness or SCD was observed. Positive correlations between age and SCD were observed, faster in females (0.307%/y) than males (0.216%/y) in temporal SCD. A negative correlation was observed between age and whole brain volume computed based on brain surface (females -1.031%/y, males -0.998%/y). In conclusion, we developed an automatic pipeline for MR-based skull thickness map, SCD, and brain volume analysis and demonstrated the sex-dependent association between minimum regional skull thickness, SCD and brain volume with age. This pipeline might be useful for personalized neurostimulation planning.

Citations
11
FWCI
2.24
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHoornweder '23Borgeest '21A '20Madan '18Ritchie '17Madan '19
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Marc Geraerts, Stefanie Verstraelen+3 more·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2023· 9 citations