Frontiers in Cellular NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Pharmacological inhibition of all known major inward cationic currents does not block the induction of spreading depolarizations
Preston C. Withers, Allen JonesiD, Kojo Bawuah Afran-Okese, Bailey J. CalderiD, Hunter J. Morrill, T. Luke ShaferiD, Dallin S. NeversiD, Jacob H NorbyiD, Rebeca Acosta, Benjamin T. BikmaniD, Arminda SuliiD, R. Ryley ParrishiD
Abstract
Spreading depolarization (SD) is a wave of profound cellular depolarization that propagates across central nervous system tissue and causes a near-complete collapse of ionic gradients. Implicated in neuropathologies including seizures, migraine with aura, traumatic brain injury, and stroke, SD is experimentally induced in animals by electrical stimulation, mechanical injury, hypoxia, elevated extracellular potassium, and various other techniques. Despite extensive research, the mechanisms underlying SD initiation remain unclear. Prior research in rodents found that simultaneously blocking sodium, calcium, and glutamatergic (AMPA and NMDA) channels prevents SD induction whereas inhibiting any two of these three currents is insufficient. This suggests that SD induction could be a product of overstimulation of any single known inward cationic current. However, some researchers propose that SD induction occurs via an unknown "SD channel." To further explore the role of known inward cationic currents in SD induction, we applied high potassium to two biological models, namely zebrafish and mice. First, we developed a novel ex vivo zebrafish model to assess SD induction in the optic tectum. Using KCl microinjection and DC local field potential recordings, we found that inhibition of sodium, calcium, and glutamatergic channels significantly decreased SD amplitude but never blocked SD induction in the zebrafish optic tectum. Similar pharmacological experiments in hippocampal mouse slices (CA1 subregion) also confirmed that SDs persist despite the same pharmacological cocktail. These findings suggest that additional mechanisms beyond sodium, calcium, and glutamatergic signaling contribute to SD induction, supporting the hypothesis that a currently unknown channel is critical in SD physiology.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Synaptic Zn2+ contributes to deleterious consequences of spreading depolarizations
M. Catherine Bennett, Katelyn M. Reinhart, … C. William Shuttleworth·Neurobiology of DiseasePeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2024
- Methods for recording and imaging spreading depolarizations and seizure-like events in mouse hippocampal slices
Yi-Ling Lu, Helen E. Scharfman·Frontiers in Cellular NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2021
- Kcnq2/Kv7.2 controls the threshold and bihemispheric symmetry of cortical spreading depolarization
Isamu Aiba, Jeffrey L. Noebels·BrainPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2021
- Interneuronal dynamics facilitate the initiation of cortical spreading depression
Wolfgang Stein, Allison L. Harris·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2021
- Persistent Na+ current couples seizure with spreading depolarization in Scn8a gain of function mice
Isamu Aiba, Yao Yu Ning, Jeffrey L. Noebels·BrainPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2025
- Dual role of Spreading Depolarization in the epileptic focus
Daria Vinokurova, Karina Tukhvatullina, … Azat Nasretdinov·EpilepsiaPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026