PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Cross-fitted instrument: a blueprint for one-sample Mendelian Randomization
William R. P. DenaultiD, Jon BohliniD, Christian Magnus PageiD, Stephen BurgessiD, Astanand JugessuriD
Abstract
Bias from weak instruments may undermine the ability to estimate causal effects in instrumental variable regression (IVR). We present here a simple solution for handling weak instrument bias by introducing a new type of instrumental variable called cross-fitted instrument (CFI). CFI splits the data at random and estimates the impact of the instrument on the exposure in each partition. The estimates are then used to perform an IVR on each partition. We adapt CFI to Mendelian randomization (MR) and term this adaptation Cross-Fitting for Mendelian Randomization (CFMR). A major advantage of CFMR is its use of all the available data to select genetic instruments, as opposed to traditional two-sample MR where a large part of the data is only used for instrument selection. Consequently, CFMR has the potential to enhance the power of MR in a meta-analysis setting by enabling an unbiased one-sample MR to be performed in each cohort prior to meta-analyzing the results across all the cohorts. In a similar fashion, CFMR enables a cross-ethnic MR analysis by accounting for ethnic heterogeneity, which is particularly important in consortia-led meta-analyses where the participating cohorts might be of different ethnicities. To our knowledge, there are currently no MR approach that can account for such heterogeneity. Finally, CFMR enables the application of MR to exposures that are rare or difficult to measure, which would normally preclude their analysis in the regular two-sample MR setting. Key messagesO_LIWe develop a new method to enable an unbiased one-sample Mendelian Randomization. C_LIO_LIThe new method provides the same power as the standard two-sample Mendelian Randomization approach and does not require summary statistics from a genome-wide association study in an independent cohort. C_LIO_LIOur approach enables a cross-ethnic instrumental variable regression to account for heterogeneity in a sample consisting of multiple ethnicities. C_LI
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Field percentile
- 23th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation
Alice R Carter, Eleanor C. M. Sanderson, … Laura D Howe·European Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2021
- Weak-Instrument Robust Tests in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization
Sheng Wang, Hyunseung Kang·BiometricsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2021
- Testing and Correcting for Weak and Pleiotropic Instruments in Two-Sample Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation
Eleanor C. M. Sanderson, Wes Spiller, Jack Bowden·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2021
- Constrained Instruments and their Application to Mendelian Randomization with Pleiotropy
Lai Jiang, Karim Oualkacha, … and for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2019
- MR-SPLIT: a novel method to address selection and weak instrument bias in one-sample Mendelian randomization studies
Ruxin Shi, Ling Wang, … Yuehua Cui·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2024
- Reassessing Instrument Strength in Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis
Xiaonan Liu, Yu‐Jyun Huang, … Tamar Sofer·medRxiv·Jun 19, 2026