bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Inferring active and passive mechanical drivers of epithelial convergent extension
Sommer AnjumiD, Deepthi S. Vijayraghavan, Rodrigo Fernández‐GonzáleziD, Ann E. SutherlandiD, Lance A. DavidsoniD
Abstract
What can we learn about the mechanical processes that shape tissues by simply watching? Several schemes suggest that static cell morphology or junctional connectivity can reveal where chains of cells transmit force or where force asymmetries drive cellular rearrangements. We hypothesize that dynamic cell shape changes from time lapse sequences can be used to distinguish specific mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis. Convergent extension (CE) is a crucial developmental motif wherein a planar tissue narrows in one direction and lengthens in the other. It is tempting to assume that forces driving CE reside within cells of the deforming tissue, as CE may reflect a variety of active processes or passive responses to forces generated by adjacent tissues. In this work, we first construct a simple model of epithelial cells capable of passive CE in response to external forces. We adapt this framework to simulate CE from active anisotropic processes in three different modes: crawling, contraction, and capture. We develop an image analysis pipeline for analysis of morphogenetic changes in both live cells and simulated cells using a panel of mechanical and statistical approaches. Our results allow us to identify how each simulated mechanism uniquely contributes to tissue morphology and provide insight into how force transmission is coordinated. We construct a MEchanism Index (MEI) to quantify how similar live cells are to simulated passive and active cells undergoing CE. Applying these analyses to live cell data of Xenopus neural CE reveals features of both passive motion and active forces. Furthermore, we find spatial variation across the neural plate. We compare the inferred mechanisms in the frog midline to tissues undergoing CE in both the mouse and fly. We find that distinct active modes may have different prevalences depending on the model system. Our modeling framework allows us to gain insight from tissue timelapse images and assess the relative contribution of specific cellular mechanisms to observed tissue phenotypes. This approach can be used to guide further experimental inquiry into how mechanics influences the shaping of tissues and organs during development.
- organism: Xenopus
- organism: mouse
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Geometric Basis of Epithelial Convergent Extension
F. Brauns, N. Claussen, … B. I. Shraiman·bioRxiv·May 30, 2023
- A mechanism for the proliferative control of tissue mechanics in the absence of growth
Min Wu, Madhav Mani·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2018
- Cell cycle-dependent active stress drives epithelia remodeling
J. Devany, D. M. Sussman, … M. L. Gardel·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2021
- Direct measurements of active forces and material properties unveil the active mechanics of early embryogenesis
Arthur Michaut, Alexander Chamolly, … Jérôme Gros·bioRxiv·May 11, 2025
- Convergent extension requires adhesion-dependent biomechanical integration of cell crawling and junction contraction
Shinuo Weng, Robert J. Huebner, John B. Wallingford·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2022
- Motility-Driven Viscoelastic Control of Tissue Morphology in Presomitic Mesoderm
Sahil Islam, Mohd Suhail Rizvi, Anupam Gupta·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2025