Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Cortical neural activity predicts sensory acuity under optogenetic manipulation.
John J. BriguglioiD, Mark AizenbergiD, Vijay BalasubramanianiD, Maria Neimark GeffeniD
Abstract
Excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the mammalian sensory cortex form interconnected circuits that control cortical stimulus selectivity and sensory acuity. Theoretical studies have predicted that suppression of inhibition in such excitatory-inhibitory networks can lead to either an increase or, paradoxically, a decrease in excitatory neuronal firing, with consequent effects on stimulus selectivity. We tested whether modulation of inhibition or excitation in the auditory cortex could evoke such a variety of effects in tone-evoked responses and in behavioral frequency discrimination acuity. We found that, indeed, the effects of optogenetic manipulation on stimulus selectivity and behavior varied in both magnitude and sign across subjects, possibly reflecting differences in circuitry or expression of optogenetic factors. Changes in neural population responses consistently predicted behavioral changes for individuals separately, including improvement and impairment in acuity. This correlation between cortical and behavioral change demonstrates that, despite complex and varied effects these manipulations can have on neuronal dynamics, the resulting changes in cortical activity account for accompanying changes in behavioral acuity.\n\nAuthor summaryExcitatory and inhibitory interactions determine stimulus specificity and tuning in sensory cortex, thereby controlling perceptual discrimination acuity. Modeling of such excitatory-inhibitory circuits has predicted that suppressing the activity of inhibitory neurons can lead to increases or, paradoxically, decreases in excitatory activity, depending on the architecture and modulation parameters of the inhibitory component of the network. Here, we capitalized on differences between subjects to test whether suppressing/activating inhibition and excitation across a range of parameters in sensory cortex can in fact exhibit such paradoxical effects for both stimulus sensitivity and behavioral discriminability. Indeed, we found that the same optogenetic manipulation in the auditory cortices of different mice could improve or impair frequency discrimination acuity, in a fashion that was predictable from the effects on cortical responses to tones. The same manipulations sometimes produced opposite changes in the behavior of different individuals, supporting theoretical predictions for inhibition-stabilized networks.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory cortex shapes sound responses in the inferior colliculus.
Jennifer M Blackwell, Alexandria M.H. Lesicko, … Maria Neimark Geffen·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2020
- All-Optical Mapping Reveals Distributed Suppression of Cortical Sensory Responses After Optogenetic Silencing
Manuel Ambrosone, Elena Montagni, … Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2025
- The influence of visual cortex on perception is modulated by behavioural state
Lloyd E. Russell, Zidan Yang, … Michael Häusser·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2019
- Optimizing optogenetic stimulation protocols in auditory corticofugal neurons based on closed-loop spike feedback
Charles-Henri Vila, R. S. Williamson, … Daniel B. Polley·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- Network influence determines the impact of cortical ensembles on stimulus detection
Hayley A. Bounds, Hillel Adesnik·NeuronPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2025
- Mice detect and discriminate temporal patterns of mesoscale optogenetic cortical stimulation
Gabrielle Stephens, Nikolas A. Francis·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026