Sign in
BioinformaticsGigaScience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how two biomedical entities are related

Daniel HimmelsteiniD, Michael ZietziD, Vincent RubinettiiD, Kyle KlosteriD, Benjamin J. HeiliD, Faisal AlquaddoomiiD, Dongbo HuiD, David N. NicholsoniD, Yun HaoiD, Blair D. SullivaniD, Michael W. NagleiD, Casey S. GreeneiD

Abstract

Hetnets, short for "heterogeneous networks", contain multiple node and relationship types and offer a way to encode biomedical knowledge. One such example, Hetionet connects 11 types of nodes -- including genes, diseases, drugs, pathways, and anatomical structures -- with over 2 million edges of 24 types. Previous work has demonstrated that supervised machine learning methods applied to such networks can identify drug repurposing opportunities. However, a training set of known relationships does not exist for many types of node pairs, even when it would be useful to examine how nodes of those types are meaningfully connected. For example, users may be curious not only how metformin is related to breast cancer, but also how the GJA1 gene might be involved in insomnia. We developed a new procedure, termed hetnet connectivity search, that proposes important paths between any two nodes without requiring a supervised gold standard. The algorithm behind connectivity search identifies types of paths that occur more frequently than would be expected by chance (based on node degree alone). We find that predictions are broadly similar to those from previously described supervised approaches for certain node type pairs. Scoring of individual paths is based on the most specific paths of a given type. Several optimizations were required to precompute significant instances of node connectivity at the scale of large knowledge graphs. We implemented the method on Hetionet and provide an online interface at https://het.io/search. We provide an open source implementation of these methods in our new Python package named hetmatpy.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
11
FWCI
0.82
Field percentile
top 32%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.