Sign in
BioinformaticsPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

Assessment of Antibody Library Diversity through Next Generation Sequencing and Technical Error Compensation.

Marco FantiniiD, Luca PandolfiniiD, Simonetta LisiiD, Michele ChirichellaiD, Ivan ArisiiD, Marco TerrignoiD, Martina GoracciiD, Federico CremisiiD, Antonino CattaneoiD

Abstract

Antibody libraries are important resources to derive antibodies to be used for a wide range of applications, from structural and functional studies to intracellular protein interference studies to developing new diagnostics and therapeutics. Whatever the goal, the key parameter for an antibody library is its diversity, i.e. the number of distinct elements in the collection, which directly reflects the probability of finding in the library an antibody against a given antigen, of sufficiently high affinity. Quantitative evaluation of antibody library diversity and quality has been for a long time inadequately addressed, due to the high similarity and length of the sequences of the library. Diversity was usually inferred by the transformation efficiency and tested either by fingerprinting and/or sequencing of a few hundred random library elements. Inferring diversity from such a small sample is, however, very rudimental and gives limited information about the real complexity, because complexity does not scale linearly with sample size. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has opened new ways to tackle the antibody library diversity quality assessment. However, much remains to be done to fully exploit the potential of NGS for the quantitative analysis of antibody repertoires and to overcome current limitations. To obtain a more reliable antibody library complexity estimate here we show a new, PCR-free, NGS approach to sequence antibody libraries on Illumina platform, coupled to a new bioinformatic analysis and software (Diversity Estimator of Antibody Library, DEAL) that allows to reliably estimate the diversity, taking in consideration the sequencing error.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
25
FWCI
1.68
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMłokosiewic '22Krawczyk '19Chernigovsk '25Petersen '24Schulte '22Friedensohn '18
62% semantic matchBioinformatics
Jakub Młokosiewicz, Piotr Deszyński, Wiktoria Wilman+6 more·Bioinformatics·Mar 10, 2022· 19 citations