Applied SciencesGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Methylation genome wide profiling in lowly and highly efficient adipose somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs
Maciej GrzybekiD, Krzysztof FlisikowskiiD, Tom C. GilesiD, Marta Dyjak, Rafał PłoskiiD, Piotr GasperowicziD, Richard David EmesiD, Paweł LisowskiiD
Abstract
Swine is a common model organism for biomedical research. Epigenetic reprogramming in SCNT embryos does not fully recapitulate the natural DNA demethylation events at fertilisation. This study aimed to conduct a genome-wide methylation profiling to detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs) responsible for epigenetic differences in stem cells that displayed high and low efficiency of SCNT and to elucidate the low efficiency of cloning rate in pigs. Adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (AMSC)s lines were isolated from adipose tissue of adult male pigs (n=20; high-efficiency cells=10; low efficiency cells= 10). Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on an Illumina HiSeq1500. Paired-end reads were filtered to remove the adapter contamination, and low-quality reads using TrimGalore!. Filtered reads were mapped to the reference genome using Bismark. MethylKit was used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (bases and tiles), showing statistically significant differential methylation between two groups: high and low-efficiency AMSCs. Hierarchical cluster analysis according to methylation patterns clearly defined groups with low and high cloning efficiency. We report 3704 bases with statistically significant differences in methylation and 10062 tiles with statistically significant differences in methylation. Most differentially methylated sites are intergenic 62%, 31% are intronic, 4% are located in exons and 4% in promoters. 37% of differentially methylated sites are located in known CpG islands (CGIs) and 4% in CpG island shores (CGSs).
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 4th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Procaine and S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) affect the expression of genes related to the epigenetic machinery and change the DNA methylation status of in vitro cultured bovine skin fibroblasts
Naiara Araújo Borges Schumann, Anelise S. Mendonça, … Maurício Machaim Franco·DNA and Cell BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2019
- Efficient Reprogramming of the Epiblast Enables the Generation of Cloned Mice
Guomeng Li, Wandong Bao, … Jiangwei Lin·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2026
- Joint profiling of 5mC, 5hmC, and the transcriptome in single cells identifies factors responsible for genome-wide DNA methylation erasure in human primordial germ cell maturation
Alex Chialastri, Kellie A. Heom, … Siddharth S. Dey·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2025
- Efficient derivation and transcriptional characterization of mouse extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell lines generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer
Shuaipeng Li, Shu Wei, … Wandong Bao·Stem Cells InternationalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- DNA Methylation Patterns Expose Variations in Enhancer-Chromatin Modifications during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
Adi Alajem, Hava Roth, … Oren Ram·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2021
- Targeted demethylation of H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 improves somatic cell reprogramming into cloned preimplantation but not postimplantation bovine concepti
Fanli Meng, Kathrin Stamms, … Björn J. Oback·Biology of ReproductionPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2020