bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Classifying cell cycle states and a quiescent-like G0 state using single-cell transcriptomics
Samantha A. O‘ConnoriD, Leonor GarciaiD, R. L. Hoover, Anoop P. PateliD, Benjamin B. BartelleiD, Jean-Philippe HugnotiD, Patrick J. PaddisoniD, Christopher L. PlaisieriD
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics has unveiled a vast landscape of cellular heterogeneity in which the cell cycle is a significant component. We trained a high-resolution cell cycle classifier (ccAFv2) using single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) characterized human neural stem cells. The ccAFv2 classifies six cell cycle states (G1, Late G1, S, S/G2, G2/M, and M/Early G1) and a quiescent-like G0 state (Neural G0), and it incorporates a tunable parameter to filter out less certain classifications. The ccAFv2 classifier performed better than or equivalent to other state-of-the-art methods even while classifying more cell cycle states, including G0. We demonstrate that the ccAFv2 classifier effectively generalizes the S, S/G2, G2/M, and M/Early G1 states across cell types derived from all three germ layers. While the G0, G1, and Late G1 states perform well in neuroepithelial cell types, their accuracy is lower in other cell types. However, misclassifications are confined to the G0, G1, and Late G1 states. We showcased the versatility of ccAFv2 by successfully applying it to classify cells, nuclei, and spatial transcriptomics data in humans and mice, using various normalization methods and gene identifiers. We provide methods to regress the cell cycle expression patterns out of single cell or nuclei data to uncover underlying biological signals. The classifier can be used either as an R package integrated with Seurat or a PyPI package integrated with SCANPY. We proved that ccAFv2 has enhanced accuracy, flexibility, and adaptability across various experimental conditions, establishing ccAFv2 as a powerful tool for dissecting complex biological systems, unraveling cellular heterogeneity, and deciphering the molecular mechanisms by which proliferation and quiescence affect cellular processes.
- organism: human
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CycleMix: Gaussian Mixture Modeling of the Cell Cycle
Jack E. Peplinski, Tallulah S. Andrews·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Computational cell cycle analysis of single cell RNA-Seq data
Marmar R. Moussa, Ion Măndoiu·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2020
- A Message Passing Framework for Precise Cell State Identification with scClassify2
Wenze Ding, Yue Cao, … Jean Yee Hwa Yang·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2025
- Cytocipher determines significantly different populations of cells in single cell RNA-seq data
Brad Balderson, Michael Piper, … Mikael Bodén A·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Predicting cell cycle stage from 3D single-cell nuclear-stained images
Gang Li, Eva K. Nichols, … William Stafford Noble·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2025
- Cell cycle gene regulation dynamics revealed by RNA velocity and deep-learning
Andrea Riba, Attila Oravecz, … Nacho Molina·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2022