Mechanisms and Safety of Ultrasound Phacoemulsification
Thomas G. GrafiD, Thomas Gisler, Silvio Emmenegger, Samuel Tanner, Rupert MenapaceiD, Silvio Di NardoiD
Abstract
ObjectiveA comprehensive technical and biomedical analysis of ultrasound-induced effects during phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) and an assessment of the potential risks associated with ultrasound emulsification MethodsModeling ultrasound wave propagation and intensities using the finite element method (FEM). Cavitation onset was experimentally validated in a pressure chamber observed with a high-speed camera. The thermal effects of ultrasound energy were estimated through established physical and thermal models and confirmed in a cuvette setup using thermistor probes. ResultsAt the distal end of the PCS tip, the ultrasound wave intensity reached 0.2 W/mm2, resulting in ocular tissue displacements in the anterior chamber below 2 {micro}m. The temperature rise in the anterior chamber was less than 0.2 {degrees}C/s. Both observations indicate negligible mechanical and thermal risk to ocular tissues. High-speed imaging confirmed cavitation confined to the tip region. Emulsification efficacy was maintained even under conditions that suppressed cavitation, including elevated ambient pressures and cavitation-inhibiting fluids. Results indicate that mechanical fragmentation by tip oscillation ("jackhammer effect") is the only relevant emulsification mechanism, while cavitation plays a negligible role. Acoustic streaming was observed during ultrasound excitation without phaco sleeve. During phacoemulsification, the sleeve suppressed acoustic streaming into the anterior chamber. ConclusionsThe findings validate the safety of ultrasound-based PCS and confirm that tissue fragmentation is primarily driven by the oscillating tips direct action.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sound from Ultrasound: Characterization of a MEMS-based personal-audio device in human temporal bones
Sunil Puria, Kevin N. O’Connor, Jeffrey Tao Cheng·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2026
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Generates Skull-Conducted Shear Waves: Computational Model and Implications for Neuromodulation
H. Salahshoor, M. G. Shapiro, M. Ortiz·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2020
- Ultrasound-mediated mechanical forces selectively kill tumor cells
A. Tijore, F. Margadant, … M. Sheetz·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2020
- High Resolution Acoustic Mapping of Gelatin-Based Soft Tissue Phantoms
H. Badawe, P. Raad, M. Khraiche·bioRxiv·May 10, 2023
- Activation Of Piezo1 But Not Nav1.2 Channels By Ultrasound at 43 MHz
Martin Loynaz Prieto, Kamyar Firouzi, … Merritt C. Maduke·Ultrasound in Medicine & BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2018
- Acoustomechanically activatable liposomes for ultrasonic drug uncaging
M. P. Purohit, K. Sinha Roy, … R. D. Airan·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2023