Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays
Betül Akgöl OksuziD, Liyan YangiD, Sameer AbrahamiD, Sergey V. VeneviD, Nils KrietensteiniD, Krishna Mohan ParsiiD, Hakan ÖzadamiD, Marlies E. OomeniD, Ankita NandiD, Hui Z. MaoiD, Ryan M. J. Genga, René MaehriD, Oliver J. RandoiD, Leonid A. MirnyiD, Johan Harmen GibcusiD, Job DekkeriD
Abstract
Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based assays are used to map chromatin interactions genome-wide. Quantitative analyses of chromatin interaction maps can lead to insights into the spatial organization of chromosomes and the mechanisms by which they fold. A number of protocols such as in situ Hi-C and Micro-C are now widely used and these differ in key experimental parameters including cross-linking chemistry and chromatin fragmentation strategy. To understand how the choice of experimental protocol determines the ability to detect and quantify aspects of chromosome folding we have performed a systematic evaluation of experimental parameters of 3C-based protocols. We find that different protocols capture different 3D genome features with different efficiencies. First, the use of cross-linkers such as DSG in addition to formaldehyde improves signal-to-noise allowing detection of thousands of additional loops and strengthens the compartment signal. Second, fragmenting chromatin to the level of nucleosomes using MNase allows detection of more loops. On the other hand, protocols that generate larger multi-kb fragments produce stronger compartmentalization signals. We confirmed our results for multiple cell types and cell cycle stages. We find that cell type-specific quantitative differences in chromosome folding are not detected or underestimated by some protocols. Based on these insights we developed Hi-C 3.0, a single protocol that can be used to both efficiently detect chromatin loops and to quantify compartmentalization. Finally, this study produced ultra-deeply sequenced reference interaction maps using conventional Hi-C, Micro-C and Hi-C 3.0 for commonly used cell lines in the 4D Nucleome Project.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 252
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characteristic arrangement of nucleosomes is predictive of chromatin interactions at kilobase resolution
Hui Zhang, Feifei Li, … Zhihua Zhang·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2016
- HI-C 2.0: AN OPTIMIZED HI-C PROCEDURE FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION GENOME-WIDE MAPPING OF CHROMOSOME CONFORMATION
Houda Belaghzal, Job Dekker, Johan Harmen Gibcus·MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2017
- Micro-C XL: assaying chromosome conformation at length scales from the nucleosome to the entire genome
Tsung-Han S. Hsieh, Geoffrey Fudenberg, … Oliver J. Rando·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2016
- Using DNase Hi-C techniques to map global and local three-dimensional genome architecture at high resolution
Wenxiu Ma, Ferhat Ay, … ZhiJun Duan·MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2018
- FISH-ing for captured contacts: towards reconciling FISH and 3C
Geoffrey Fudenberg, Maxim Imakaev·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2017
- Cryomilling Tethered Chromatin Conformation Capture reveal new insights into inter-chromosomal interactions
Jiang Xu, Sanjeev Kumar, … Lin Chen·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2022