Performance comparison of high throughput single-cell RNA-Seq platforms in complex tissues
Yolanda Colino‐SanguinoiD, Laura Rodríguez de la FuenteiD, Brian GlossiD, Andrew M. K. LawiD, Kristina HandleriD, Marina PajiciD, Robert SalomoniD, David Gallego‐OrtegaiD, Fátima Valdés‐MoraiD
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics has emerged as the preferred tool to define cell identity through the analysis of gene expression signatures. However, there are limited studies that have comprehensively compared the performance of different scRNAseq systems in complex tissues. Here, we present a systematic comparison of two well-established high throughput 3-scRNAseq platforms: 10x Chromium and BD Rhapsody, using tumours that present high cell diversity. Our experimental design includes both fresh and artificially damaged samples from the same tumours, which also provides a comparable dataset to examine their performance under challenging conditions. The performance metrics used in this study consist of gene sensitivity, mitochondrial content, reproducibility, clustering capabilities, cell type representation and ambient RNA contamination. These analyses showed that BD Rhapsody and 10x Chromium have similar gene sensitivity, while BD Rhapsody has the highest mitochondrial content. Interestingly, we found cell type detection biases between platforms, including a lower proportion of endothelial and myofibroblast cells in BD Rhapsody and lower gene sensitivity in granulocytes for 10x Chromium. Moreover, the source of the ambient noise was different between plate-based and droplet-based platforms. In conclusion, our reported platform differential performance should be considered for the selection of the scRNAseq method during the study experimental designs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative analysis of commercially available single-cell RNA sequencing platforms for their performance in complex human tissues
Yue Julia Wang, Jonathan Schug, … Klaus H. Kaestner·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2019
- Direct Comparative Analysis of 10X Genomics Chromium and Smart-seq2
Xiliang Wang, Yao He, … Zemin Zhang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2021
- Comparative Analysis of Commercial Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Technologies
Marco Claudio De Simone, Jonathan Hoover, … Spyros Darmanis·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2024
- Comparative Analysis of Whole Transcriptome Single-Cell Sequencing Technologies in Complex Tissues
S. Salcher, I. Heidegger, … A. Pircher·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2023
- Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA Sequencing Platforms and Methods
John M. Ashton, Hubert Rehrauer, … Sridar V. Chittur·Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBTPeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2021
- Comparative analysis of droplet-based ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq systems
Xiannian Zhang, Tianqi Li, … Jianbin Wang·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2018