bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
CTCF-mediated insulation and chromatin environment modulate Car5b escape from X inactivation
He FangiD, Ana R. Tronco, Giancarlo BonoraiD, Truong N. NguyeniD, Jitendra ThakuriD, Joel B. BerletchiD, Galina N. Filippova, Steven HenikoffiD, Jay ShendureiD, William Stafford NobleiD, Christine M. DistècheiD, Xinxian DengiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe number and escape levels of genes that escape X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in female somatic cells vary among tissues and cell types, potentially contributing to specific sex differences. Here we investigate the role of CTCF, a master chromatin conformation regulator, in regulating escape from XCI. CTCF binding profiles and epigenetic features were systematically examined at constitutive and facultative escape genes using mouse allelic systems to distinguish the inactive X (Xi) and active X (Xa) chromosomes. ResultsWe found that escape genes are located inside domains flanked by convergent arrays of CTCF binding sites, consistent with the formation of loops. In addition, strong and divergent CTCF binding sites often located at the boundaries between escape genes and adjacent neighbors subject to XCI would help insulate domains. Facultative escapees show clear differences in CTCF binding dependent on their XCI status in specific cell types/tissues. Concordantly, deletion but not inversion of a CTCF binding site at the boundary between the facultative escape gene Car5b and its silent neighbor Siah1b resulted in loss of Car5b escape. Reduced CTCF binding and enrichment of a repressive mark over Car5b in cells with a boundary deletion indicated loss of looping and insulation. In mutant lines in which either the Xi-specific compact structure or its H3K27me3 enrichment was disrupted, escape genes showed an increase in gene expression and associated active marks, supporting the roles of the 3D Xi structure and heterochromatic marks in constraining levels of escape. ConclusionOur findings indicate that escape from XCI is modulated both by looping and insulation of chromatin via convergent arrays of CTCF binding sites and by compaction and epigenetic features of the surrounding heterochromatin.
- organism: mouse
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 5
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- X-inactivation escapee domains are CTCF-cohesin independent chromatin compartments
Antonia Hauth, Agnese Loda, … Édith Heard·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2026
- Contribution of epigenetic changes to escape from X-chromosome inactivation
Bradley Philip Balaton, Carolyn J. Brown·Epigenetics & ChromatinPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2021
- Cross-species examination of X-chromosome inactivation highlights domains of escape from silencing
Bradley Philip Balaton, Oriol Fornés, … Carolyn J. Brown·Epigenetics & ChromatinPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2021
- Escape from X-inactivation in twins exhibits intra- and inter-individual variability across tissues and is heritable
Antonino Zito, Amy L. Roberts, … Kerrin S. Small·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2023
- Escape from X inactivation is directly modulated by levels of Xist non-coding RNA
Antonia Hauth, Jasper Panten, … Édith Heard·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2024
- Extensive cellular heterogeneity of X inactivation revealed by single-cell allele-specific expression in human fibroblasts.
Marco Garieri, Georgios Stamoulis, … Stylianos E. Antonarakis·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2018