bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
A novel multidimensional reinforcement task in mice elucidates sex-specific behavioral strategies
M. G. Kutlu, J. E. Zachry, L. J. Brady, P. R. Melugin, C. Sanders, J. Tat, A. R. Johnson, K. Thibeault, A. J. Lopez, E. S. Calipari
Abstract
BackgroundSex is a critical biological variable in the neuropathology of psychiatric disease, and in many cases, women represent a vulnerable population. It has been hypothesized that sex differences in neuropsychiatric disorders are manifestations of differences in basic reward processing. However, preclinical models often present rewards in isolation, ignoring that ethologically, reward seeking requires the consideration of potential aversive outcomes.\n\nMethodsWe developed a Multidimensional Cue Outcome Action Task (MCOAT) to dissociate motivated action from cue learning and valence. Mice are trained in a series of operant tasks. In phase 1, mice acquire positive and negative reinforcement in the presence of discrete discriminative stimuli. In phase 2, both discriminative stimuli are presented concurrently allowing us to parse innate behavioral strategies based on reward seeking and shock avoidance. Phase 3 is punished responding where a discriminative stimulus predicts that nose-poking for sucrose occurs concurrently with footshock, allowing for the assessment of how positive and negative outcomes are relatively valued.\n\nResultsFemales prioritize avoidance of negative outcomes over seeking positive, while males have the opposite strategy. In cases where rules are uncertain, males and females employ different strategies, with females demonstrating bias for shock avoidance.\n\nConclusionsThe MCOAT has broad utility for neuroscience research where pairing this task with recording and manipulation techniques will allow for the definition of the discrete information encoded within cellular populations. Ultimately, we show that making conclusions from unidimensional data leads to inaccurate generalizations about sex-specific behaviors that do not accurately represent ground truth.
- organism: mouse
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: synaptic & neural circuits
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions
C. G. Tara, K. G. Wallin-Miller, … B. Moghaddam·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2019
- A neural substrate of sex-dependent modulation of motivation by value
Julia Cox, Adelaide R. Minerva, … Ilana B. Witten·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2023
- Sex differences in neural representations of social and nonsocial reward in the medial prefrontal cortex.
Jennifer Isaac, Sonia Corbett Karkare, … Malavika Murugan·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 13, 2024
- Sex differences in discrimination behavior and orbitofrontal engagement during context-gated reward prediction
Sophie Peterson, Amanda Maheras, … Ronald Keiflin·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2024
- Sex-specific exploration accounts for differences in valence learning in male and female mice
Heike Schuler, Eshaan S Iyer, … Rosemary C. Bagot·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2025
- Sexually dimorphic neural encoding of threat discrimination in nucleus accumbens afferents drives suppression of reward behavior
J Muir, YC Tse, … Rosemary C. Bagot·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022